2022 Workshop on Benchmarking Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet of Things (CPS-IoTBench) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/cps-iotbench56135.2022.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking Audio-based Deep Learning Models for Detection and Identification of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salman et al [ 36 ] analyzed five audio features, and identified the GammaTone Cepstral Coefficients (GTCC) as efficient for drone detection, achieving 99.9% accuracy with a Gaussian SVM kernel. Katta et al [ 37 ] benchmarked DNN, CNN, LSTM, and Convolutional-LSTM (CLSTM), achieving 98.52%, 98.6%, 98.11%, and 98.6% accuracy, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Salman et al [ 36 ] analyzed five audio features, and identified the GammaTone Cepstral Coefficients (GTCC) as efficient for drone detection, achieving 99.9% accuracy with a Gaussian SVM kernel. Katta et al [ 37 ] benchmarked DNN, CNN, LSTM, and Convolutional-LSTM (CLSTM), achieving 98.52%, 98.6%, 98.11%, and 98.6% accuracy, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar works based on the radar for drone classification in different radar systems (1)(2)(3)(4) GHz) can achieve a high accuracy of 95-100% using machine learning methods [22][23][24]. Currently, the leading drone detection techniques are based on either RF or acoustic signals [15,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Therefore, the following literature review focuses on related work that is based on these two approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, many research works have been published to address UAV detection, tracking, and classification problems. The main drone detection technologies are: radar sensors [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], RF sensors [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], audio sensors [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ], and camera sensors using visual UAV characteristics [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. Based on the above-mentioned sources, the advantages and disadvantages of each drone detection technology are compared in Table 2 .…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the sound produced by propeller blades is frequently employed for detection because it has a comparatively larger amplitude. Numerous research works have examined the sound produced by drones, using characteristics like frequency, amplitude, modulation, and duration to identify a drone’s existence [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Drone Detection Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UAVs equipped with cameras and other sensors can be used to inspect and monitor equipment and infrastructure such as power lines and wind turbines. Real-time data transmission via 5G networks can enable remote monitoring and control of these systems, improving their reliability and reducing maintenance costs [66]. UAVs can also be used for emergency response and disaster management.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%