2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmarking a novel inorganic scintillation detector for applications in radiation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like other plastic detecting systems, 6,24,25 our proposed detector has the advantage of being water equivalent with lower energy dependence and dose perturbations, in comparison with inorganic scintillating detectors. 13,14,28 These results on the phantom prototype confirm the feasibility of developing systems based on waterequivalent scintillating ribbons for small-field QA. They are in-line with the state of the arts and compare well with the performances achieved by QA systems based on a high spatial resolution diode array.…”
Section: Phantom Performancessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Like other plastic detecting systems, 6,24,25 our proposed detector has the advantage of being water equivalent with lower energy dependence and dose perturbations, in comparison with inorganic scintillating detectors. 13,14,28 These results on the phantom prototype confirm the feasibility of developing systems based on waterequivalent scintillating ribbons for small-field QA. They are in-line with the state of the arts and compare well with the performances achieved by QA systems based on a high spatial resolution diode array.…”
Section: Phantom Performancessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…All the curves show similar behavior with a rapid increase, followed by a beam stabilization step (a plateau) ending with a rapid fall-down while the beam switched off. As the photon counter rise time is in the ns range, the longer rise time observed is due to LINAC beam stabilization and characteristics of the scintillator [43,44]. The maximum signal collected by the counter increases with field size.…”
Section: Relative Dose Response With Field Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly sensitive X-ray detectors are much desired for achieving high-contrast images and reducing ionizing radiation risks in medical, industrial and scientific applications. [1,2] The modern mainstream indirect-conversion X-ray detection systems use an efficient scintillator (such as Gd 2 O 2 S:Tb [3] and (Zn,Cd)S:Ag [4] ), and have been applied in practical radiation therapy applications. [5,6] However, the indirect-conversion X-ray detectors have drawbacks of optical crosstalk and long luminance lifetime, thus, the researchers propose progressive direct-conversion X-ray detection systems aiming to realize high spatial resolution and low dose X-ray detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%