2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ee01199a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark uranium extraction from seawater using an ionic macroporous metal–organic framework

Abstract: Large-scale uranium extraction from seawater (UES) is widely considered as reconciliation to increasing global energy demand and climate change crises. However, an ideal uranium sorbent combining features of high capacity,...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before turning on the Xenon lamp, the COFs were immersed in the uranium-spiked seawater overnight to achieve adsorption equilibrium. The uranium is mainly in the speciation of [UO 2 (CO 3 ) 3 ] 4- in seawater, and the adsorbent needs to compete with carbonate groups for binding uranyl ions 55 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 . In comparison with the binding affinity of CO 3 2- to UO 2 2+ , hydrazine-carbonyl groups through COFs 1 to 3 and the hydrazine sites in COF-4 showed stronger binding affinities towards UO 2 2+ than towards CO 3 2- , therefore the [U(VI)O 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] 2+ adsorbed spontaneously on all the COFs 64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before turning on the Xenon lamp, the COFs were immersed in the uranium-spiked seawater overnight to achieve adsorption equilibrium. The uranium is mainly in the speciation of [UO 2 (CO 3 ) 3 ] 4- in seawater, and the adsorbent needs to compete with carbonate groups for binding uranyl ions 55 , 57 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 . In comparison with the binding affinity of CO 3 2- to UO 2 2+ , hydrazine-carbonyl groups through COFs 1 to 3 and the hydrazine sites in COF-4 showed stronger binding affinities towards UO 2 2+ than towards CO 3 2- , therefore the [U(VI)O 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] 2+ adsorbed spontaneously on all the COFs 64 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a view toward harvesting marine uranium resources, it is essential to develop materials that can resist biofouling and selectively capture uranium under high ionic strength conditions. Adsorbent materials such as porous carbon-based adsorbents, layered organic–inorganic materials, organic polymers, biomaterials, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have all been investigated for uranium extraction from seawater. However, these adsorbents possess drawbacks, including one or more of the following: slow adsorption kinetics, low adsorption capacities, poor stability, inferior recyclability, or rapid marine biological passivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Materials being developed for effective U(VI) extraction from natural water include organic natural ber materials, inorganic porous materials, metal-organic frameworks (MOF), covalent organic frameworks (COF), and porous aromatic frameworks. [11][12][13][14][15][16] However, most of these sorbents are in powder form and therefore not suitable for practical applications. 17 Compared to inorganic powders, macroscopic materials such as ber-based materials and foam materials have the advantages of cheapness, ease of delivery, abundance of functional groups, high selectivity, and more practical application prospects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%