2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark of Automated Machine Learning with State-of-the-Art Image Segmentation Algorithms for Tool Condition Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several papers investigate the use of AutoML methods to make the benefits of MLbased models even easier to apply to tool condition monitoring [6,[27][28][29]. AutoML leverages the autonomous adaptation of models to changing process conditions, especially in individualized production.…”
Section: Process Conditions Among Multiple Tool Lifecycles Varyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers investigate the use of AutoML methods to make the benefits of MLbased models even easier to apply to tool condition monitoring [6,[27][28][29]. AutoML leverages the autonomous adaptation of models to changing process conditions, especially in individualized production.…”
Section: Process Conditions Among Multiple Tool Lifecycles Varyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the comparison of the available tool wear datasets from various dimensions are shown in Table 8. Specifically, "Public" indicates whether the dataset is publicly available, "Tool images" represents the data type in NJUST-CCTD: An Image Database for Milling Tool Wear Classification with Deep L Milling -García-Ordás [6] Milling 573 Wu [7] Milling 8400 B. Lutz [8] Turning 100 Bergs.T [9] Milling 3000 B. Lutz [12] Milling 207 Brili, N [13] Turning 9333 NJUST-CCTD Milling 8000…”
Section: The Advantages Of the Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergs et al [9] introduced 3000 images of tool wear for image classification and segmentation. Lutz et al [12] recorded a heterogeneous dataset of 207 industrial cutting tool images and compare manually trained segmentation networks and automated machine learning. Brili et al [13] collected 9333 thermal imaging data when the tool was not soaked in cutting fluid after working.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of vision-based condition monitoring techniques is smaller and in the field of machine tools mainly focused on monitoring the wear of cutting tools. [22] implement a new automatic machine learning setup where they remedy the tedious task of hyper-parameter set up for machine learning systems by applying amongst other, different data augmentation techniques to build robust classifiers for the detection of wear on cutting tools. [38] use classical CNNs to predict the wear on classical cutting tools.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%