2008
DOI: 10.5194/tc-2-95-2008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark experiments for higher-order and full-Stokes ice sheet models (ISMIP–HOM)

Abstract: Abstract. We present the results of the first ice sheet model intercomparison project for higher-order and full-Stokes ice sheet models. These models are compared and verified in a series of six experiments of which one has an analytical solution obtained from a perturbation analysis. The experiments are applied to both 2-D and 3-D geometries; five experiments are steady-state diagnostic, and one has a time-dependent prognostic solution. All participating models give results that are in close agreement. A clea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
376
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(397 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(9 reference statements)
20
376
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our modeled surface velocity agrees well with the benchmark velocity computed by other software in the benchmark (Figure 3). Results from both higher-order and full-Stokes models are within the interval described by the benchmark models [Pattyn et al, 2008].…”
Section: Verification Of Issm With Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our modeled surface velocity agrees well with the benchmark velocity computed by other software in the benchmark (Figure 3). Results from both higher-order and full-Stokes models are within the interval described by the benchmark models [Pattyn et al, 2008].…”
Section: Verification Of Issm With Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The condition number for the discretized system of equations (also defined at the radius of the eigenspectrum of the discretized system of equations) correspondingly increases by almost 2 orders of magnitude for the BP model and FS models and almost 3 orders of magnitude for the 3D thermal model. While this tends to show a larger impact on the thermal model, the magnitude of the condition number [Pattyn et al, 2008]. Linearized results from Gudmundsson [2003] are also shown in black for the no-slip bed case.…”
Section: Meshmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This, is simply not enough to spatially resolve most of these very narrow and deep outlet glacier channels and, furthermore, the depth and detailed basal topography is still unknown for many of them. In recent years, clear advances have been made in terms of process representation within these models such as a more robust treatment of grounding line motion (Docquier et al 2011;Pollard and DeConto 2009;Schoof 2007) and including fast ice flow and ice streaming by considering higher-order stresses to include longitudinal stress transfer (Bueler and Brown 2009;Pattyn 2003;Price et al 2011;Pattyn et al 2008), but most of these models are not yet fully operational on the required spatial resolution of outlet glaciers (Stone et al 2010). And, importantly, major deficiencies remain in their representation of processes acting at the marine boundary such as calving and ocean melt.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model intercomparisons may contain elements of both verification and validation. Verification (or falsification) may result if the models in comparison solve the equations with essentially different numerical methods (Pattyn et al 2007), or if a verified benchmark is available.…”
Section: Testing Ice Sheet Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%