2018
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2017.1420259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark CCSD(T) and DFT study of binding energies in Be7 − 12: in search of reliable DFT functional for beryllium clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, these structures were optimized and ranked at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level. The global minimum structure is C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) which was further confirmed using the PBE0, B2PLYP‐D3 and CCSD(T) methods with 6–311G(d) basis set considering the energy among the isomers of Be 2 (AMD) is too close. In addition, the CASSCF calculation of C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) (Scheme S4) was also performed and the result shows that there is little multiconfigurational character in the wave function of C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, these structures were optimized and ranked at the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level. The global minimum structure is C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) which was further confirmed using the PBE0, B2PLYP‐D3 and CCSD(T) methods with 6–311G(d) basis set considering the energy among the isomers of Be 2 (AMD) is too close. In addition, the CASSCF calculation of C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) (Scheme S4) was also performed and the result shows that there is little multiconfigurational character in the wave function of C 2 ‐ Be 2 (AMD) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most energetically stable structures found in the screening were reminimized using the TPPSh, which is a hybrid method 61 based on TPSS 60 and which has been proved to provide a high‐quality description for the type of systems included in this study 61 . We have also used, for the sake of completeness, the M06‐2X functional, 62 which has been shown to give accurate and balanced binding energies for Be clusters when compared with ab initio CCSD(T) calculations 63 . Finally, taking into account that a reliable description of weakly bound systems, such as some of the structures we are dealing with, requires the inclusion of high‐order correlation corrections to be accounted for, we have also used a CCSD(T) procedure in our optimizations.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 61 We have also used, for the sake of completeness, the M06‐2X functional, 62 which has been shown to give accurate and balanced binding energies for Be clusters when compared with ab initio CCSD(T) calculations. 63 Finally, taking into account that a reliable description of weakly bound systems, such as some of the structures we are dealing with, requires the inclusion of high‐order correlation corrections to be accounted for, we have also used a CCSD(T) procedure in our optimizations. In all cases, a def2‐TZVP basis set 64 has been used.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the cuboid clusters the Normalized Clustering Energy (NCE) was calculated. The NCE 22 is a measure of how much more stable a cluster is compared to the n = 1 smallest stoichiometric global minimum configuration, i.e. the fully relaxed dimer molecule.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Normalized Clustering Energymentioning
confidence: 99%