2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark case studies in structural design optimization using the force method

Abstract: A structural optimization algorithm is developed for truss and beam structures under stress-displacement or frequency constraints. The algorithm combines the mathematical programming based on the Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) technique and the finite element technique based on the Integrated Force Method. A new approach based on the single value decomposition technique has been developed to derive the compatibility matrix required in the force method. Benchmark case studies illustrate the procedure an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These examples include four well-known space trusses and two planar bridge structures. The number of design variables for the first to fifth examples are 8,16,7,32,26, respectively and for the last example 4, 8 and 12 variables are used. Similarly, the number of Colliding Bodies or agents for these examples are considered as 30, 40, 40, 50, 40 and 20, respectively.…”
Section: Weight Minimization Of Trusses Under Static Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These examples include four well-known space trusses and two planar bridge structures. The number of design variables for the first to fifth examples are 8,16,7,32,26, respectively and for the last example 4, 8 and 12 variables are used. Similarly, the number of Colliding Bodies or agents for these examples are considered as 30, 40, 40, 50, 40 and 20, respectively.…”
Section: Weight Minimization Of Trusses Under Static Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this example, the first two natural frequencies of the structure are considered as the constraints (ω 1 = 4 HZ, ω 2 ≥ 6 HZ). This example has been solved by Konzelman [31] using a dual method (DM) and by Sedaghati [32] using the force method (FM). Gomes [28] has investigated the problem using the Particle Swarm Optimization.…”
Section: A 37-bar Planar Trussmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 HZ. This example has been solved previously by Konzelman [35] using a dual method (DM) and by Sedaghati [36] using the force method (FM). Gomes [21] has investigated the problem using the Particle Swarm Optimization.…”
Section: ð5:29þmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a mere size optimization. This example has been solved by Sedaghati [19] using the force method (FM). Gomes [9] has investigated the problem using the Particle Swarm Optimization.…”
Section: A 72-bar Space Trussmentioning
confidence: 99%