1994
DOI: 10.1063/1.466884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark calculations with correlated molecular wave functions. IV. The classical barrier height of the H+H2→H2+H reaction

Abstract: Using systematic sequences of correlation consistent Gaussian basis sets from double to sextuple zeta quality, the classical barrier height of the H+H2 exchange reaction has been calculated by multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) methods. The MRCI calculations for collinear H3 have also been calibrated against large basis set full CI (FCI) results, which demonstrate that the MRCI treatment leads to energies less than 1 μhartree (≤0.001 kcal/mol) above the FCI energies. The dependence of both the H2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
1,146
1
15

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,715 publications
(1,174 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
1,146
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…[90] using HF or any of the DFT methods that are implemented. As an illustration, Figure 1 shows the radial EMDs of the water dimer and of the monomer (taken as the first molecule in Table 1), computed using HF and the Dunning-style aug-cc-pVTZ basis set [94][95][96] obtained from the ESML basis set exchange. [97,98] Figure 2 shows the difference Compton profile between these systems, which we define as in Ref.…”
Section: Emd and Compton Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[90] using HF or any of the DFT methods that are implemented. As an illustration, Figure 1 shows the radial EMDs of the water dimer and of the monomer (taken as the first molecule in Table 1), computed using HF and the Dunning-style aug-cc-pVTZ basis set [94][95][96] obtained from the ESML basis set exchange. [97,98] Figure 2 shows the difference Compton profile between these systems, which we define as in Ref.…”
Section: Emd and Compton Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, three successively larger calculations were carried out at each geometry of interest. The three AVnZ energies corresponding to each geometry were then extrapolated to the CBS limit using the expression 32 With the three CCSD(T)/AVnZ energies corresponding to n ) 2, 3, and 4, this leads to three simultaneous equations which are solVed for the three unknowns E CBS , B, and C.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B3LYP hybrid density functional was used for calculation at DFT 33 level using several split-valence basis sets. The geometries of the reactants (AlH 3 and C 3 H 6 ), transition state and the product were optimized at this level of theory using 6-31G**, 6-311++G** [34][35][36][37][38][39][40] , cc-pVDZ and AUG-cc-pVTZ [41][42][43][44][45] basis sets. The nature of each stationary point was confirmed in each case by frequency calculations; all the minima were verified to have all positive frequencies and the transition state to have only one imaginary frequency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%