2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark Calculations of Energetic Properties of Groups 4 and 6 Transition Metal Oxide Nanoclusters Including Comparison to Density Functional Theory

Abstract: The heats of formation and the normalized clustering energies (NCEs) for the group 4 and group 6 transition metal oxide (TMO) trimers and tetramers have been calculated by the Feller-Peterson-Dixon (FPD) method. The heats of formation predicted by the FPD method do not differ much from those previously derived from the NCEs at the CCSD(T)/aT level except for the CrO3 nanoclusters. New and improved heats of formation for Cr3O9 and Cr4O12 were obtained using PW91 orbitals instead of Hartree-Fock (HF) orbitals. D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
51
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
6
51
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We also performed calculations by changing the starting orbitals for the CCSD(T) calculations from the Hartree–Fock orbitals to Kohn–Sham orbitals from DFT, generated using the PW91 generalized gradient exchange‐correlation functional . The reference energy in CCSD arises from diagonalizing the normal HF Hamiltonian with these Kohn–Sham orbitals.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed calculations by changing the starting orbitals for the CCSD(T) calculations from the Hartree–Fock orbitals to Kohn–Sham orbitals from DFT, generated using the PW91 generalized gradient exchange‐correlation functional . The reference energy in CCSD arises from diagonalizing the normal HF Hamiltonian with these Kohn–Sham orbitals.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there are no experimental results available, then we compare our DFT results with CCSD(T) result. Because earlier studies suggests that, the CCSD(T) values are highly accurate [7]. From the Fig.…”
Section: F Overall Performances Of Selected Dft Functionalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Theoretical studies on structure and energetic calculations of transition metal compounds are difficult, because of its partially filled and near degenerate d orbitals [4], [6]. The above problem can be overcome with the use of coupled-cluster method (CCSD(T)) and multi-reference approaches (MRCI) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Close agreement between the results of BPW91/6–311 + G* computations and experimental data has been found for Fe n O − ( n = 2–6), M O 3 and M O 4 ( M ScZn), MnO n − ( n = 1–4), (FeO) n ( n = 1–4), and Cr 3 O 8 , The BPW91 functional was found to reliably reproduce the results of calculations obtained using the couple‐cluster method with singles, doubles, and non‐iterative inclusion of triples [CCSD(T)] for (TiO 2 ) n , (CrO 3 ) n , and FeO 2 clusters. Computations of the atomization energies of ( M O 3 ) n ( M Cr, Mo, W; n = 1–4), as well as the energetic properties of groups 4 and 6 transition metal oxide nanoclusters, and finally the binding energies using standard reference sets by a variety of different DFT and hybrid DFT methods have shown the BPW91 accuracy to be comparable to that of more recently developed exchange‐correlation functionals.…”
Section: Details Of Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%