2014
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/47/6/061001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark calculation of total cross sections for ionization–excitation of helium

Abstract: The total cross section for simultaneous ionization-excitation of helium by electron impact has been revisited within the framework of the fully nonperturbative B-spline R-matrix with pseudostates approach. A long-standing discrepancy regarding the absolute normalization of the cross section for ionization with simultaneous excitation of the residual ion into the He + (2p) is resolved in favour of the values suggested by Bloemen et al (1981

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of pseudostates contained the configurations 1sn , 2 n , and 3 n , with the latter two sets describing doubly excited autoionizing states as well as the ionization-excitation process. Note that the increase of the principal quantum of the "core" electron from n = 2 [2,3] to n = 3 in the present work rapidly increased the number of states in the calculation, thereby limiting the highest pseudostate energy that we could handle.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The set of pseudostates contained the configurations 1sn , 2 n , and 3 n , with the latter two sets describing doubly excited autoionizing states as well as the ionization-excitation process. Note that the increase of the principal quantum of the "core" electron from n = 2 [2,3] to n = 3 in the present work rapidly increased the number of states in the calculation, thereby limiting the highest pseudostate energy that we could handle.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In recent years, we have further developed a fully nonperturbative B-spline R-matrix (close-coupling) with pseudostates (BSRMPS) method and applied it to both direct ionization [1] and ionization with excitation problems [2,3]. Despite the success achieved in employing a projection approach to obtain the cross sections from excitation amplitudes of the positive-energy discrete (i.e., finite-range) pseudostates, some skepticism remains about the validity of the approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different kinds of theoretical methods have been developed for the atomic system, such as the distorted-wave impulse approximation (DWIA) [1,9,10], distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) [9][10][11], Brauner-Briggs-Klar theory [12][13][14], Bspline R-matrix approach [15,16], convergent close-coupling (CCC) method [17][18][19], exterior complex scaling (ECS) * songbin@pks.mpg.de † xjun@ustc.edu.cn method [20][21][22], and time-dependent close-coupling (TDCC) method [23][24][25]. We note that the ECS, CCC, and TDCC methods could almost exactly solve the three-body system (electron plus hydrogen).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ionization with simultaneous excitation is significantly more correlated, and hence its contribution to the ionization cross section is usually small compared with that of direct ionization processes [31,32]. Our results show, however, that the ionization cross section can be underestimated by about 15% if one neglect the contributions of ionization-excitation processes for heavy ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%