2016
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/734/2/022003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Benchmark 3 - Springback of an Al-Mg alloy in warm forming conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned that, globally, the test conditions are identical to the ones adopted in the cylindrical cup proposed as benchmark at conference Numisheet 2016 [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that, globally, the test conditions are identical to the ones adopted in the cylindrical cup proposed as benchmark at conference Numisheet 2016 [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this comparison first it is necessary to investigate what possibilities are available in the AutoForm program to introduce and modify material parameters. This question is clearly demonstrated at the NumiSheet 2016 benchmark test where the springback behavior of aluminum alloys were investigated and compared applying various simulation packages [13].…”
Section: Simulation Tasks In the Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to define FLC curves for arbitrary temperatures and to input several FLC curves covering the whole temperature range of the given simulation. Applying the Material Generator we created the material files for the AA6082 material on the basis of AA5754_demo_material file created for the Numisheet 2016 Benchmark-3 [13].…”
Section: Forming Limit Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to analyse numerically the warm forming conditions of the AA5086 alloy using thermo-mechanical finite element analysis. In order to assess the accuracy of the adopted model, the cylindrical cup proposed as benchmark at the conference Numisheet 2016 is the example selected (Manach et al, 2016). Furthermore, the influence of the process temperature conditions on the springback is evaluated through the split-ring test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed finite element model is presented in Section 4, including the staggered coupling procedure, which is important for modelling of the thermo-mechanical contact conditions. Section 5 comprises the comparison between numerical and experimental results, which were kindly provided by the benchmark committee (Manach et al, 2016). The main conclusions of this study are discussed in Section 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%