2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bench, Bar, and Ring Dips: Do Kinematics and Muscle Activity Differ?

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to profile and compare the kinematics, using 3D motion capture, and muscle activation patterns, using surface electromyography (sEMG), of three common dip variations; the bench, bar, and ring dips. Thirteen experienced males performed four repetitions of each dip variation. For each participant, repetitions 2–4 were time-normalized and then averaged to produce a mean value for all kinematic and sEMG variables. The mean maximal joint angles and mean peak sEMG amplitudes were compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dip is a popular bodyweight exercise frequently used to strengthen the muscles of the upper limb and trunk, and more specifically, the triceps brachii (TB) and pectoralis major (PM) [ 1 , 2 ]. There are many technique variations of the dip which can either decrease movement complexity (i.e., the bench dip) or increase movement complexity (i.e., the ring dip), which have recently been shown to exhibit differing neuromechanical profiles [ 3 ]. However, the most common variation appears to be the bar dip [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dip is a popular bodyweight exercise frequently used to strengthen the muscles of the upper limb and trunk, and more specifically, the triceps brachii (TB) and pectoralis major (PM) [ 1 , 2 ]. There are many technique variations of the dip which can either decrease movement complexity (i.e., the bench dip) or increase movement complexity (i.e., the ring dip), which have recently been shown to exhibit differing neuromechanical profiles [ 3 ]. However, the most common variation appears to be the bar dip [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%