2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BEM analysis of the interaction factor for vertically loaded dissimilar piles in saturated poroelastic soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the symmetry, only 3 types of piles (ie, pile 1, 2, and 5) are selected to analyze. As shown in Tables and , the results in this study are in agreement with those of Poulos & Davis and Liang & Song, which proves the feasibility and accuracy of the presented method.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the symmetry, only 3 types of piles (ie, pile 1, 2, and 5) are selected to analyze. As shown in Tables and , the results in this study are in agreement with those of Poulos & Davis and Liang & Song, which proves the feasibility and accuracy of the presented method.…”
Section: Numerical Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In order to validate the accuracy of the proposed method, comparisons between the presented study and Poulos & Davis and Liang & Song are carried out. As shown in Figures and , a pile group of 3 × 3 with a rigid cap embedded in multilayered soils is presented, where a represents the pile spacing, and R is the distance between the point sink and the center of the pile group.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If equation (5) is not satisfied, then θ is adjusted, and steps 4-6 are repeated; if any pile does not satisfy equation 7, its diameter will be changed to a neighboring diameter which is bigger than it. (7) Step 7: the optimized design with different pile diameters is converted into that with different pile spacing using equation 8:…”
Section: Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e piles are usually uniformly arranged in conventional PRF designs, that is, a consistent pile diameter, length, and spacing. Several studies have shown that even if the load is uniform, the peripheral piles either carry a greater proportion of the load than the central piles under a rigid cap or suffer from a flexible cap which exhibits differential settlement due to pilesoil-raft interactions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], and nonuniform loading can exacerbate these problems. Padfield and Sharrock [11] briefly introduced a method of enhancing pile group performance by varying the pile geometries across the group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%