2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belowground resource utilization in monocultures and mixtures of Scots pine and Norway spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Norway spruce has shallower root systems than Scots pine, potentially reducing intraspecific competition for water in mixed stands (Fichtner et al, 2017). In contrast, Lutter et al (2021) found that these species' roots overlap in mixed stands at boreal sites, suggesting competition for resources among trees of both species. They also showed that both species enlarged their root system in mixed stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Norway spruce has shallower root systems than Scots pine, potentially reducing intraspecific competition for water in mixed stands (Fichtner et al, 2017). In contrast, Lutter et al (2021) found that these species' roots overlap in mixed stands at boreal sites, suggesting competition for resources among trees of both species. They also showed that both species enlarged their root system in mixed stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, Norway spruce suffered from light competition due to canopy stratification, growing slower in mixtures than pure stands (Holmström et al, 2018;Mina et al, 2018). Despite a potential advantage of mixtures in terms of productivity (Ruiz-Peinado et al, 2021), both species could suffer from competition for light and water resources in mixed stands (Huuskonen et al, 2021a;Lutter et al, 2021). In this regard, the admixture of Scots pine with Norway spruce decreased basal area growth in a way that might not have been considered properly in the Motti model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our NPK treatment resulted in increased mineral N fluxes and soil N stock, validating the efficacy of the treatments on soil N availability. Second, roots of pine trees can take up 90% of soil nutrients within a 3 m distance and the uptake distance becomes even shorter when nutrients are added 33 , 34 . So the trees in the center of the plots must have been responsive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%