2021
DOI: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1904330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bell v Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 3274: Weighing current knowledge and uncertainties in decisions about gender-related treatment for transgender adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This decision was met with equivocal support and criticism, not least as it has implications for the broader application of the Gillick framework for consent to medical procedures. (It has since been successfully appealed [15]) A lack of good quality evidence has been acknowledged [16]. A recent review by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services [17] indicated that there is very little in terms of empirical evidence in the field, both in terms of overall GD epidemiology, the association of GD with mental health problems, the rate and types of medical interventions provided and outcomes (including outcomes for those not treated medically or surgically) in the longer term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This decision was met with equivocal support and criticism, not least as it has implications for the broader application of the Gillick framework for consent to medical procedures. (It has since been successfully appealed [15]) A lack of good quality evidence has been acknowledged [16]. A recent review by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services [17] indicated that there is very little in terms of empirical evidence in the field, both in terms of overall GD epidemiology, the association of GD with mental health problems, the rate and types of medical interventions provided and outcomes (including outcomes for those not treated medically or surgically) in the longer term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bei der Behandlung der GI/GD im Jugendalter müssen ethische Abwägungen von Nutzen und potenziellem Schaden im Falle einer möglicherweise verfrüht ebenso wie einer zu spät indizierten somatomedizinischen Behandlung im Kontext der Adoleszenzentwicklung vorgenommen werden. Dabei geht es auch darum, mit bleibenden Ungewissheiten umzugehen 52 . Im Vordergrund steht die Unterstützung einer schrittweise zu bewältigenden sozialen Transition, zu der das Angebot einer individualisiert zu indizierender psychotherapeutischer Begleitung ebenso gehört wie das Angebot einer entwicklungsorientierten schrittweise gestuften somatomedizinischen Behandlung zur Angleichung des körperlichen Erscheinungsbildes an die empfundene Geschlechtsidentität, bei der wiederum jeder Schritt eine sorgfältige interdisziplinäre Indikationsstellung erfordert.…”
Section: Behandlungsempfehlungen Bei Jugendlichenunclassified
“…This approach is underpinned by the view that a child or adolescent’s stated gender identity should be endorsed not questioned, and that they should be supported to undertake social transition, medical transition, masculinizing chest surgery, and, some also argue, genital surgery. Those advocating this approach consider these gender affirming treatments medically and ethically essential (Baams, 2021 ; de Vries et al, 2021 ; Transgender Health, 2020 ; Walch et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: The Gender Affirmative Treatment Approach For Gender Dysphor...mentioning
confidence: 99%