1997
DOI: 10.1119/1.18758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bell and Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger theorems revisited

Abstract: The original theorems of Bell and of Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (GHZ) are extended from ideal to real situations using an intuitive and straightforward approach. This alternative derivation has the merit of showing that if a theorem is valid whenever we have perfect correlations, it cannot be totally wrong in the case of almost perfect correlations. Therefore, it is probably easy (i.e., by introducing only small changes in the original argument) to extend the result to deal with imperfect correlations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simply setting ⟨α⟩ exp = ⟨α⟩ LHV T = M −2 and inverting expression (14), we obtain ⟨ a 2 ⟩ nonlocal > 1 2. This verifies the already-proved limit of 50% fidelity, which is necessary for violation of any Bell-type inequality based on the GHZ theorem [40,41]. In most cases it is also the bound for discriminating less than maximally entangled states.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Simply setting ⟨α⟩ exp = ⟨α⟩ LHV T = M −2 and inverting expression (14), we obtain ⟨ a 2 ⟩ nonlocal > 1 2. This verifies the already-proved limit of 50% fidelity, which is necessary for violation of any Bell-type inequality based on the GHZ theorem [40,41]. In most cases it is also the bound for discriminating less than maximally entangled states.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…According to the data shown in Fig. 2, the fidelity observed for the state prepared in our experiment is (79.6 ± 0.5)%, which is greatly exceed the minimum bound of 50%31. Thus, with high statistical significance, genuine n-qubit entanglement of the GHZ states created in our experiment is confirmed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This novel situation attracted again attention to the original Bell inequality [26]. We also point to related theoretical studies on the original Bell inequality which were done during the previous years, see [27,28,29,30,31]. In [29,31], it is, for example, shown that, unlike the CHSH inequality, the original Bell inequality distinguishes between classicality and quantum separability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%