2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Believing in other minds: Accurate mentalizing does not predict religiosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other evidence has suggested the direct link between mentalizing and supernatural belief is small (Lindeman et al, 2015; Maij et al, 2017; Vonk & Pitzen, 2017). The indirectness of this relationship may explain why.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other evidence has suggested the direct link between mentalizing and supernatural belief is small (Lindeman et al, 2015; Maij et al, 2017; Vonk & Pitzen, 2017). The indirectness of this relationship may explain why.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Importantly, they found that it was the ability to mentalize that mediated the negative relationship between autism and religious belief. Lowicki and Zajenkowski (2016Zajenkowski ( , 2017 and Vonk and Pitzen (2017) note that aspects of ASD-such as low emotional intelligence-are negatively associated with religious belief. Again, these are the aspects of ASD that relate to the ability to develop a sound theory of mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As to the relationship between mentalizing and supernatural beliefs, evidence suggests the link is small, and depending on the study somewhat tenuous (Lindeman et al, 2015;Maij et al, 2017;Vonk & Pitzen, 2017). The indirectness of this relationship may be part of the explanation.…”
Section: Mentalizing and Anthropomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%