Beliefs of Adolescents on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Abstinence: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

Beaulieu, Denis; Vézina‐Im, Lydi‐Anne; Simard, Dominic; Boucher, Dominique

doi:10.31770/2561-7516.1002

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…I.) 34 35 and validated by two other experts (A. L. 36 and S. D. 37 ). Disagreements were resolved by discussion between L. A. V. I. and A. L. until consensus was reached, and a third party (S. D.) was available to resolve potential disagreements.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beliefs about Healthy Sleep Habits in Adults with Diabetes Compared to Adults without Diabetes: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Sleep is part of a healthy lifestyle and in adults with diabetes, inadequate sleep is associated with risks of developing complications. The objective was to compare beliefs about healthy sleep habits (HSHs) in adults with versus without diabetes based on the Reasoned Action Approach. Methods A total of 56 adults with and 98 without diabetes answered open-ended questions regarding their beliefs about: avoiding screen use in bed; having a regular sleep schedule; or avoiding caffeine, alcohol, and cigarettes before bedtime. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify the most important beliefs, similarities, and differences between both groups. Results Both groups reported that adopting HSHs could improve sleep. Having a regular sleep schedule was perceived to facilitate diabetes management in adults with diabetes. Negative consequences specific to adopting each HSH were identified in both groups. Adopting HSHs was associated with mainly negative emotions (e.g., stress, anxiety, fear) in both groups. Avoiding screen use in bed was associated with anxiety of not knowing blood glucose levels at night in adults with diabetes. Partners, parents, and friends were considered the most important individuals who would approve of adopting HSHs, but they were often perceived as unlikely to adopt HSHs themselves in both groups. Adults with diabetes perceived more barriers to adopting HSHs. Facilitating factors for both groups included removing triggers of unhealthy sleep habits, behavior substitution, using reminders, time management, and social support. Discussion These beliefs can guide the development of behavioral sleep interventions, including interventions specifically for adults with diabetes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beliefs about Healthy Sleep Habits in Adults with Diabetes Compared to Adults without Diabetes: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A questionnaire was developed following the recommendations from the RAA authors (23) and the methodology suggested by Gagné and Godin (35) . A previous qualitative study (36) allowed the identification of the modal salient beliefs (behavioural, normative and control beliefs items) on SSB abstinence among a similar population. Briefly, semi-structured interviews of about 10-15 min were conducted among thirty adolescents (aged 12-17 years).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlates of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among adolescents

Beaulieu

Vézina‐Im

Turcotte

et al. 2020

Public Health Nutr.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:To identify correlates and underlying beliefs regarding the adolescents’ intention to abstain from consuming sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) and the consumption of ≤1 daily portion of SSB.Design:Correlational study.Setting:Region of Chaudière-Appalaches in the province of Quebec, Canada.Participants:311 adolescents aged 13–18 years completed a self-administrated online questionnaire based on the Reasoned Action Approach. Frequency and quantity of different types of SSB within the past month were measured.Results:Total mean SSB intake was 882·6 ml/d (654·0 kJ/d ). Only 11·3 % abstained from SSB within the last month. Intention to abstain from SSB was explained by identification as SSB abstainers (β = 0·47), perceived norm (β = 0·32), attitude (β = 0·30), age 13–14 years (β = –0·27) and perception of the school environment (β = 0·14), which explained 66 % of the variance. Consumption of ≤1 daily portion of SSB was explained by the intention to abstain (OR = 1·55; 95 % CI 1·14, 2·11), perceived behavioural control to abstain (OR = 1·80; 95 % CI 1·29, 2·52), sex (girls v. boys: OR = 2·34; 95 % CI 1·37, 3·98) and socio-economic status (advantaged v. disadvantaged school: OR = 2·08; 95 % CI 1·21, 3·56). Underlying beliefs (i.e. more energy, decreased risk of addiction and friends’ approval) associated with intention as well as perceived barriers (e.g. access to SSB, after an activity that makes you thirsty), and facilitating factors (e.g. access to water) linked to SSB consumption were identified.Conclusions:The results can inform public health interventions to decrease SSB consumption and their associated health problems among adolescents.

show abstract

“…Then, participants were asked eight open-ended questions related to limiting recreational screen time to a maximum of 2 h/day about: (1) advantages and disadvantages of adopting the behavior (behavioral cognitive beliefs), (2) positive and negative emotions related to this behavior (behavioral affective beliefs), (3) people who would agree or not with this behavior (normative beliefs), and (4) barriers and facilitating factors (control beliefs). A qualitative content analysis was realized independently by two experts [ 30 , 31 ] to identify the most important beliefs using a 75% cumulative frequency of mention criterion [ 13 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychosocial Correlates of Recreational Screen Time among Adolescents

Roussel-Ouellet

Beaulieu²,

Vézina‐Im³

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study objective was to identify the psychosocial correlates of recreational screen time among adolescents. Data collection took place in four high schools from the Chaudière-Appalaches region (Quebec, Canada) from late April to mid-May 2021. A total of 258 French-speaking adolescents (69.8% between 15 and 16 years and 66.3% girls) answered an online questionnaire based on the Reasoned Action Approach. Recreational screen time was measured using the French version of a validated questionnaire. Adolescents reported a mean of 5 h and 52 min/day of recreational screen time. Recreational screen time was associated with being a boy (β = 0.33; p < 0.0001) and intention to limit recreational screen time to a maximum of 2 h/day (β = −0.15; p = 0.0001); this model explained 30% of the variance in behavior. Intention to limit recreational screen time to a maximum of 2 h/day in the next month was associated with attitude (β = 0.49; p < 0.0001), self-identity (β = 0.33; p < 0.0001), being a boy (β = −0.21; p = 0.0109), perceived behavioral control (β = 0.18; p = 0.0016), and injunctive norm (β = 0.17; p < 0.0001); this model explained 70% of the variance in intention. This study identified avenues to design public health interventions aimed at lowering recreational screen time among this population.

show abstract

Beliefs of Adolescents on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Abstinence: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

Cited by 5 publications

References 35 publications

Beliefs about Healthy Sleep Habits in Adults with Diabetes Compared to Adults without Diabetes: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

Beliefs about Healthy Sleep Habits in Adults with Diabetes Compared to Adults without Diabetes: A Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study

Correlates of sugar-sweetened beverages consumption among adolescents

Psychosocial Correlates of Recreational Screen Time among Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About