2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3812346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bottan and Perez-Truglia (2020a) study the causal effect of home price expectations on the timing of home sales using a large-scale field experiment featuring administrative data. Laudenbach et al (2021) use an information experiment to study the causal effect of subjective beliefs about stock returns on investment choices measured in administrative account data. In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, Hanspal et al (2020) provide experimental evidence that beliefs about the duration of the stock market recovery shape households' expectations about their own wealth and their planned investment decisions and labor market activity.…”
Section: Household Financementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bottan and Perez-Truglia (2020a) study the causal effect of home price expectations on the timing of home sales using a large-scale field experiment featuring administrative data. Laudenbach et al (2021) use an information experiment to study the causal effect of subjective beliefs about stock returns on investment choices measured in administrative account data. In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, Hanspal et al (2020) provide experimental evidence that beliefs about the duration of the stock market recovery shape households' expectations about their own wealth and their planned investment decisions and labor market activity.…”
Section: Household Financementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, demand effects should be lower in tasks in which real money is at stake. Field outcomes A small number of studies manage to link information provision with natural outcomes from the field, such as the take-up of job offers (Bursztyn et al, 2020b), the repayment of credit card debt (Bursztyn et al, 2019), welfare take-up (Finkelstein and Notowidigdo, 2019), policy choices of politicians (Hjort et al, 2019), campaign donations (Perez-Truglia andCruces, 2017), voting behavior (Cruz et al, 2018;Gerber et al, 2020;Kendall et al, 2015), canvassing activity using an online application (Hager et al, 2020(Hager et al, , 2021, home sales (Bottan and Perez-Truglia, 2020a), credit card spending (Galashin et al, 2020), or stock trading choices of retail investors (Laudenbach et al, 2021). The key advantage of these studies is that they provide unobtrusive behavioral outcome data from a natural setting.…”
Section: Obfuscated Follow-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Perez-Truglia (2020a) study the causal effect of home price expectations on the timing of home sales using a large-scale field experiment featuring administrative data. Laudenbach et al (2021) use an information experiment to study the causal effect of subjective beliefs about stock returns on investment choices measured in administrative account data. In the context of the coronavirus pandemic, Hanspal et al (2020) provide experimental evidence that beliefs about the duration of the stock market recovery shape households' expectations about their own wealth and their planned investment decisions and labor market activity.…”
Section: Household Financementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, demand effects should be lower in tasks in which real money is at stake. Field outcomes A small number of studies manage to link information provision with natural outcomes from the field, such as the take-up of job offers (Bursztyn et al, 2020b), the repayment of credit card debt (Bursztyn et al, 2019), welfare take-up (Finkelstein and Notowidigdo, 2019), policy choices of politicians (Hjort et al, 2019), campaign donations (Perez-Truglia and Cruces, 2017), voting behavior (Cruz et al, 2018;Gerber et al, 2020;Kendall et al, 2015), canvassing activity using an online application (Hager et al, 2020(Hager et al, , 2021, home sales (Bottan and Perez-Truglia, 2020a), credit card spending (Galashin et al, 2020), or stock trading choices of retail investors (Laudenbach et al, 2021). The key advantage of these studies is that they provide unobtrusive behavioral outcome data from a natural setting.…”
Section: Obfuscated Follow-upsmentioning
confidence: 99%