2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beliefs about public debt and the demand for government spending

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
22
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests valuable policy implications regarding the optimization of economic and environmental objectives. Alternatively, a derivative of public debt, that is, beliefs about public debt, can reliably explain the demand for government spending (Roth et al, 2022). Overall, these studies provide sufficient evidence on how public debt affects various factors of an economy, revealing multiple perspective of this fiscal tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding suggests valuable policy implications regarding the optimization of economic and environmental objectives. Alternatively, a derivative of public debt, that is, beliefs about public debt, can reliably explain the demand for government spending (Roth et al, 2022). Overall, these studies provide sufficient evidence on how public debt affects various factors of an economy, revealing multiple perspective of this fiscal tool.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This finding suggests valuable policy implications regarding the optimization of economic and environmental objectives. Alternatively, a derivative of public debt, that is, beliefs about public debt, can reliably explain the demand for government spending (Roth et al. , 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study also adds to the growing economics literature that uses survey experiments to study how information affects public policy preferences in various policy areas (see Haaland et al (2021) for a review). Examples include Cruces et al (2013), Alesina et al (2018), andFehr et al (2022) on preferences towards redistribution, Bursztyn (2016) and Lergetporer et al (2018) on education policy preferences, Haaland and Roth (2020) on attitudes towards immigration, or Blesse and Heinemann (2020) and Roth et al (2022) on preferences towards state mergers and public debt. We extend this literature by conducting parallel factual-information experiments with citizens and politicians and compare how both groups react to factual educational-performance information.…”
Section: Literature Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Folgen von wirtschaftlicher (Un-)Informiertheit werden zunehmend in Umfrageexperimenten nachgewiesen. Roth et al (2021) zeigen zum Beispiel, wie sich die Wahrnehmung der staatlichen Budgetrestriktion auswirkt. Personen, die den öffentlichen Schuldenstand unter-/überschätzen, unterstützen höhere/niedrigere Staatsausgaben, da sie jeweils den Finanzierungsspielraum des Staates über-/ unterschätzen.…”
Section: Informationen Und Wirtschaftspolitische Präferenzenunclassified