2010
DOI: 10.1080/03601270903534853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beliefs about Aging: Implications for Future Educational Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding older adults’ expectations may also be a way to identify those at increased risk for depression or lack of engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Sellers, Bolender, and Crocker (2010) examined beliefs about aging qualitatively in a sample of older adults finding that some older adults believed that decline in physical health was unavoidable and a part of the aging process, further believing that that they could not maintain their health regardless of their attitude. By better understanding how ERA influence health behaviors and outcomes, we can be better prepared to intervene in older adult populations, to help promote healthier lifestyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding older adults’ expectations may also be a way to identify those at increased risk for depression or lack of engagement in health-promoting behaviors. Sellers, Bolender, and Crocker (2010) examined beliefs about aging qualitatively in a sample of older adults finding that some older adults believed that decline in physical health was unavoidable and a part of the aging process, further believing that that they could not maintain their health regardless of their attitude. By better understanding how ERA influence health behaviors and outcomes, we can be better prepared to intervene in older adult populations, to help promote healthier lifestyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family life educator attention to the FLE programming needs of older adults is an area in need of further attention. Most of the extant literature was published over a decade ago, and contemporary studies have been based on survey research focused specifically on wellness and health (e.g., AARP, 2000; Ballard & Morris, 2003; Beverly et al, 2005; Brossoie et al, 2010; Cise et al, 2018; Cohen‐Mansfield, & Frank, 2008; Sellers et al, 2010), with limited attention on family and relationship issues that are relevant to the lives of many midlife and older adults (e.g., grandfamily dynamics, repartnering in later life, sexual and gender minority issues). Furthermore, with the exception of studies that were designed to investigate older individuals' use of technology (e.g., Anderson, 2017), little is known about the programming and broader learning preferences of midlife and older adults.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some qualitative research studies have provided additional nuance to enhance understanding of the perceived educational programming needs of midlife and older adults. For example, in their qualitative analysis of focus group data on midlife adults' beliefs about aging, Sellers et al (2010) reported that health was indeed a fundamental issue for participants, although health was discussed in terms of psychological and emotional wellness relative to developing and maintaining positive views on aging. Other qualitative studies have yielded similar findings, revealing the appeal of offering educational opportunities that apply a holistic perspective on health.…”
Section: Programming Needs For Midlife and Older Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strong negative viewpoint hinders IGC because of someone's experience in the past. Barriers related to perceptions of others include age discrimination [46,57,58], a different mindset [32,58] and interests [59,60], and generational resistance [27,46,58]. Moreover, a lack of understanding of IGC [29,61], a lack of awareness of differences between generations [27,32,62], a lack of empathy [47,58], building interpersonal trust [32,63] and a lack of respect [47,58] are challenging to crossgenerational collaboration.…”
Section: Barriers Dimensions Of Intergenerational Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These barriers are related to how one generation conceives of working with another generation. Barriers in this category are feeling underappreciated or unappreciated [32,58,59] and lack of selfconfidence, and the feeling of reacting too slowly [47,64]. Fear of technology [59,61,65], functional limitations [46,61,66], lack of motivation [61] and feeling isolated [46] are barriers related to the emotional dimension.…”
Section: Barriers Dimensions Of Intergenerational Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%