2008
DOI: 10.5210/bsi.v17i1.1929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief in Free Will: Measurement and Conceptualization Innovations

Abstract: Though the existence of free will seems to be a background assumption in Western life, very little research has examined the belief, and the handful of studies that have done so suggest only a modest endorsement and unclear relationships to other variables. However, methodological flaws in the earlier studies likely produced an underestimation of the strength of the belief among the general population. The current study developed and then administered a new measure of belief in free will to samples of senior h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
93
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Several explanations are possible, including the majority of the students not carefully reading/comprehending the essays and the brief manipulations not being sufficient to impact strongly held beliefs. According to Ogletree and Oberle (2008), only 15% of college students support a hard determinism perspective; similarly, Rakos et al (2008) argued that-"a generalized libertarian belief in free will is the 'default' philosophy of most persons" (p.31). The brief argument offered in the "one outcome" manipulation was seemingly not effective in countering such a belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Several explanations are possible, including the majority of the students not carefully reading/comprehending the essays and the brief manipulations not being sufficient to impact strongly held beliefs. According to Ogletree and Oberle (2008), only 15% of college students support a hard determinism perspective; similarly, Rakos et al (2008) argued that-"a generalized libertarian belief in free will is the 'default' philosophy of most persons" (p.31). The brief argument offered in the "one outcome" manipulation was seemingly not effective in countering such a belief.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, participants completed items used in previous research to manipulate or measure free will, including two from Baumeister et al (2009) determinism/free will manipulation ("I am able to override the genetic and environmental factors that sometimes influence my behaviors", "All behavior is determined by brain activity, which in turn is determined by a combination of environmental and genetic factors"-reversed scored), three from Stroessner and Green (1990) Free Will-Determinism Scale-Libertarianism Factor ("I will have free will all of my life", "I have free will in life, regardless of group expectations or pressures"; "I am free to make choices in Science Publications JSS my life regardless of social conditions") and one item ("I have free will even when my choices are limited by external circumstances") that loaded on the free will factor from the Rakos et al (2008). A 5-point scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" was used for all of the agency and free will items.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations