2015
DOI: 10.1177/0022022115572226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief in a Zero-Sum Game as a Social Axiom

Abstract: This article introduces a novel concept, Belief in a Zero-Sum Game (BZSG), proposed as another belief dimension in the family of social axioms. We conceptualize BZSG as a belief system about the antagonistic nature of social relations—that one person’s gain is possible only at the expense of other persons. It appears on a level of personal convictions and as a cultural worldview ideology. We found that persons or nations who believe in a zero-sum game engage in win-lose social exchanges over limited resources.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
185
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
4
185
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Personality was assessed with a 25-item measure of the five-factor (Big 5) model of personality (Brody and Ehrlichman, 1998) on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all true of me and 7 = very true of me ). Based on the correlational findings observed in prior studies (Taylor and McFatter, 2003; Różycka-Tran et al, 2015), we particularly considered extraversion (e.g., talkative, outgoing; α = 0.79), neuroticism (e.g., anxious, worrying; α = 0.85), and agreeableness (e.g., warm, generous; α = 0.71). One’s perceived socioeconomic status (SES), which relates with zero-sum thinking (Różycka-Tran et al, 2015), was measured by a commonly used scale (e.g., Kraus et al, 2009; “What level do you think your household income belongs to?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personality was assessed with a 25-item measure of the five-factor (Big 5) model of personality (Brody and Ehrlichman, 1998) on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all true of me and 7 = very true of me ). Based on the correlational findings observed in prior studies (Taylor and McFatter, 2003; Różycka-Tran et al, 2015), we particularly considered extraversion (e.g., talkative, outgoing; α = 0.79), neuroticism (e.g., anxious, worrying; α = 0.85), and agreeableness (e.g., warm, generous; α = 0.71). One’s perceived socioeconomic status (SES), which relates with zero-sum thinking (Różycka-Tran et al, 2015), was measured by a commonly used scale (e.g., Kraus et al, 2009; “What level do you think your household income belongs to?”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recently identified social axiom is a “general belief about the antagonistic nature of social relations, shared by people in a society or culture and based on the implicit assumption that a finite amount of goods exists in the world, in which one person’s winning makes others the losers” ([13], p. 526). Stemming from game theory [14], it appears that there are relatively permanent convictions that social relations are like a zero-sum game (i.e., antagonistic), which can be measured using the Belief in a Zero-Sum Game (BZSG) scale [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stemming from game theory [14], it appears that there are relatively permanent convictions that social relations are like a zero-sum game (i.e., antagonistic), which can be measured using the Belief in a Zero-Sum Game (BZSG) scale [13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations