2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Belief-dependent preferences and reputation: Experimental analysis of a repeated trust game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See the discussion inAttanasi et al (2016), p. 649, where they argue that role dependence of guilt preferences is plausible in asymmetric games (see, e.g.,Attanasi et al, 2013Attanasi et al, , 2018, for indirect experimental evidence corroborating the assumption). In particular, they discuss how the assumption…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…See the discussion inAttanasi et al (2016), p. 649, where they argue that role dependence of guilt preferences is plausible in asymmetric games (see, e.g.,Attanasi et al, 2013Attanasi et al, , 2018, for indirect experimental evidence corroborating the assumption). In particular, they discuss how the assumption…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The main treatment variable is the value we assign to k i = k −i , the concavity of the investment cost function in eqs. (8) and (12). We have two main treatments: High-cost, with k i = k −i = 0.6, and Low-cost, with k i = k −i = 0.4.…”
Section: Behavioral Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(1) and the investment cost function in eq. (8). To achieve saliency, in the experimental game we rescale players' payoff function U i in eq.…”
Section: Behavioral Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach is related to psychological game theory [14], in which utilities are belief-dependent and beliefs are updated as the game unfolds [1,[15][16][17]. This is also the case in our model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%