1921
DOI: 10.1007/bf02978970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte von Zähnen und Gebiss der Reptilien

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, the economy of speculation required to construct the Tooth Family theory (merely a sphere of inhibition temporarily surrounding each developing tooth) far surpasses the number and complexity of biologically improbable speculations required by the Zahnreihe theory; and both theories can account for the ontogeny of the wave replacement of alternate teeth. Unfortunately, neither theory accounts for any description yet given of the sequence of tooth initiation in embryo reptiles (Harrison, 1901;Woerdeman, 1919: Osborn, 1971) and mammals (Osborn, 1970). Woerdeman (1919) gave a somewhat prolix account of the ontogeny of the crocodilian dentition.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So far, the economy of speculation required to construct the Tooth Family theory (merely a sphere of inhibition temporarily surrounding each developing tooth) far surpasses the number and complexity of biologically improbable speculations required by the Zahnreihe theory; and both theories can account for the ontogeny of the wave replacement of alternate teeth. Unfortunately, neither theory accounts for any description yet given of the sequence of tooth initiation in embryo reptiles (Harrison, 1901;Woerdeman, 1919: Osborn, 1971) and mammals (Osborn, 1970). Woerdeman (1919) gave a somewhat prolix account of the ontogeny of the crocodilian dentition.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, neither theory accounts for any description yet given of the sequence of tooth initiation in embryo reptiles (Harrison, 1901;Woerdeman, 1919: Osborn, 1971) and mammals (Osborn, 1970). Woerdeman (1919) gave a somewhat prolix account of the ontogeny of the crocodilian dentition. Because he failed to reconstruct these developing dentitions his descriptions may be inaccurate.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Snakes and lizards, for example, generally form multiple sets of teeth throughout life (polyphyodonty), whereas mammals form only two. Despite being a topic of study for over a century (Bolk, 1922;Edmund, 1960;Leche, 1895;Woerdeman, 1919), the cellular basis of tooth replacement is poorly understood. Two reasons account for this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Edmund has produced the theoretical basis for understanding the patterns of tooth succession in the lower vertebrates and has shown that these patterns may be explained by a consideration of tooth production and tooth replacement. He accepts the term Zahnreihe of Woerdeman (1919Woerdeman ( , 1921 to describe the teeth which are produced by an initiating stimulus (as it moves caudad along the jaw) before the arrival of the next such stimulus. Gillette (1955) has shown that the life cycle of the tooth in Runa pipiens may be divided into a number of stages, either on strictly morphological grounds, or on the degree of morphological change which occurs during equal fractions of the relative time occupied by the total life cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%