2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10963-018-9120-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being Ritual in Mesolithic Britain and Ireland: Identifying Ritual Behaviour Within an Ephemeral Material Record

Abstract: Acceptance of ritual as a valid interpretation of Mesolithic behaviour has slowly emerged over the past decade; the 'silly season' heralded by Mellars (Antiquity 83:502-517, 2009) has not materialised, though in Ireland and Britain difficulties persist in defining what might constitute 'ritual' away from the graveside. New discoveries from both the development-led and academic sectors enable Mesolithic archaeologists to better establish which elements of the archaeological record can be interpreted as ritual. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 'ritual' aspects fit how a number of Mesolithic archaeologists have interpreted other forms of depositional practices as part of some sort of tripartite Mesolithic cosmology -especially focussing on the wetland and liminal nature of the depositional contexts and a particular importance of axes (e.g. Bergsvik 2009;Glørstad 2010:229-247;Blinkhorn & Little 2018). However, the aforementioned seemingly 'mundane' characteristics of many of the Mesolithic hoards do not fit neatly into common conceptions of Mesolithic cosmologies.…”
Section: Ritualized Mesolithic Hoardingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These 'ritual' aspects fit how a number of Mesolithic archaeologists have interpreted other forms of depositional practices as part of some sort of tripartite Mesolithic cosmology -especially focussing on the wetland and liminal nature of the depositional contexts and a particular importance of axes (e.g. Bergsvik 2009;Glørstad 2010:229-247;Blinkhorn & Little 2018). However, the aforementioned seemingly 'mundane' characteristics of many of the Mesolithic hoards do not fit neatly into common conceptions of Mesolithic cosmologies.…”
Section: Ritualized Mesolithic Hoardingmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…comm). Blinkhorn and Little (2018) 22 highlight the number of recorded Mesolithic pits within Britain, which have substantially increased over the last two decades primarily due to developer funded archaeology. They suggest pits may mark places as special and/or provide a means for the 'correct' deposition of materials, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their interpretation as large pits, provides additional data on this significant research issue within British later prehistory (e.g. Anderson-Whymark & Thomas, 2011;Bailey, 2018;Blinkhorn & Little, 2018;Garrow, 2006Garrow, , 2007Roberts & Marshall, 2020). The literature indicates that 'pits' have a plethora of uses in prehistory including settlement, mining, through to proxies for the arcane; pits within British prehistory are, as Garrow concluded for the British and Irish Neolithic, 'a diverse phenomenon' (Garrow, 2011, 219).…”
Section: Archeosciencesmentioning
confidence: 97%