2009
DOI: 10.1177/0891241609341541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being Period: An Examination of Bridging Discourse in a Historical Reenactment Group

Abstract: An ethnography found that when members of a historical reenactment group behave in ways that seem inconsistent with the group’s ideology, they engage in discourse to demonstrate to other members that their behavior is congruent with the group’s ideology and, in doing so, strengthen connections with other members who have different standards for behavior or different interpretations of the group’s ideology. The term bridging discourse is introduced to refer to this practice. Bridging discourse is useful for mem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research grounded in sociology and political theory demonstrates that heterogeneity strengthens communities, facilitates continuity, enhances members' experiences (Omi and Winant 1994;Putnam 2000), helps maintain member engagement (Rubenson 2005), and heightens members' sense of belonging (Crowther and Cooper 2002;Decker 2010). This work describes how heterogeneity allows communities to accommodate the varying needs and motivations of a range of members (Cohen 1985) as well as how heterogeneity is managed using frame alignment strategies that unite diverse individuals (Benford and Snow 2000;Decker 2010;Kretsedemas 2000;Snow et al 1986;Wry, Lounsbury, and Glynn 2011). Overall, this work posits that when communities accommodate the varying needs of their members, heterogeneity contributes to continuity.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Community Continuitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research grounded in sociology and political theory demonstrates that heterogeneity strengthens communities, facilitates continuity, enhances members' experiences (Omi and Winant 1994;Putnam 2000), helps maintain member engagement (Rubenson 2005), and heightens members' sense of belonging (Crowther and Cooper 2002;Decker 2010). This work describes how heterogeneity allows communities to accommodate the varying needs and motivations of a range of members (Cohen 1985) as well as how heterogeneity is managed using frame alignment strategies that unite diverse individuals (Benford and Snow 2000;Decker 2010;Kretsedemas 2000;Snow et al 1986;Wry, Lounsbury, and Glynn 2011). Overall, this work posits that when communities accommodate the varying needs of their members, heterogeneity contributes to continuity.…”
Section: Heterogeneity and Community Continuitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…And while the visitor's center and announces that all those in our tour group need to report to the briefing room for a pre-tour briefing. Suddenly, I realize what is happening here-we are being exposed to a performance, a historical reenactment of sorts, meant to bridge discourse with patrons (Decker 2010) while legitimizing and defending the American strategy of nuclear deterrence (Masco 2008). Furthermore, by treating this event as a 20 reenactment depicting a specific time in history, there is an explicit construction of masculine identity vis-à-vis the military experience (Hunt 2008).…”
Section: Chapter 7: Target 2 9-megaton Ground-burst (Titan Missile Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was at that moment that I decided to utilize living history, or historical reenactment, as a research method (Pickering 2010)-much like when archaeologists use experimental archaeology to recreate past toolmaking, construction, or artwork contemporarily(Planel and Stone 2002). I attempted to change my mindset from anthropologist to missileer, to pretend I was in the Air Force during the Cold War-a process that is a core component in what historical reenactors call "being period"(Decker 2010). While the briefing ends with a video describing the Titan II rocket and the role of nuclear deterrence in winning the Cold War, I close my eyes, take a deep breath, and by the time my eyelids flick open, Marty and I were heading down for a shift…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community acceptance and consensus are integral to the creation of a knowledge base within the community. While differing interpretations can be argued amongst participants using logic, documentation and opinion (Decker, 2009), it is through community consensus of implicit knowledge that impressions are judged and notions of authenticity expressed (Strauss, 2001(Strauss, , 2002.…”
Section: Serious Leisurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were also a few people who expressed an aversion to requirements for standards of authenticity, these participants were only interested in a very narrow facet of re-enactment (usually combat), and did not seem to understand how other people could enjoy aspects that they personally did not (Strauss, 2001;Decker, 2009). In this study, these negative opinions were only encountered in passing during participant observation, with those who volunteered to take a more active role in the study, for example, as key informants, voluntarily placing their emphasis on the importance of the pursuit of authenticity and on their sense of identity in the community.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%