“…Pacific Islanders have been told many times before that their homelands are tiny, remote, and inherently vulnerable; this is not an invention of the climate change era, but a longstanding colonial trope that has merely been reinvented and reinvigorated in today's environmental narratives (Barnett and Campbell, 2010;Farbotko, 2005Farbotko, , 2010Hau'ofa, 1993). It is essential also to consider previous work on Pacific Islanders' practical, social, and spiritual attachment to land (Campbell, 2010), now a key influence on their approaches to climate change (see Newell, Hermann and Kempf, Struck-Garbe, Nolet this volume), as well as pre-existing discourses of decline and progress, decaying culture and increasing sin, missionary salvation and virtuous modernization (Tomlinson, 2004;Rudiak-Gould, 2010), which are now being used to understood climate change (Newell, Nolet, this volume;Rudiak-Gould, 2012b). We must also take guidance from previous scholarly documentation of islanders' great environmental knowledge, gained through gardening, fishing, sailing, and sheer curiosity, now undergoing processes of both decay and invigoration (Johannes, 2002), both of them partly as a result of climate change.…”