2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being (im)polite in New Zealand workplaces: Māori and Pākehā leaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research into identity in institutional contexts has, naturally, also reflected this growing interest in ethnicity (e.g. Holmes et al 2008;Gumperz 1982 [chapter 8];Roberts 2011;and Schnurr et al 2007).…”
Section: Such a Context 'Sets Limits Around What […] The Institutionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into identity in institutional contexts has, naturally, also reflected this growing interest in ethnicity (e.g. Holmes et al 2008;Gumperz 1982 [chapter 8];Roberts 2011;and Schnurr et al 2007).…”
Section: Such a Context 'Sets Limits Around What […] The Institutionamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membership is determined by how successfully an individual has acquired the shared repertoire, or by his understanding of the processes and goals of the CofP (Holmes and Meyerhoff 1999: 176). Schnurr et al (2007) make use of the concept of a CofP to investigate cultural diversity within the workplace, specifically focusing on politeness and leadership within ethnicized communities, where "ethnicized" refers to multicultural communities made up of members of different cultural and linguistic backgrounds (in this study, specifically Maori and Pākehā leaders in New Zealand workplaces). The purpose of their research is not to emphasize intercultural differences, but rather to investigate how politeness and leadership are accomplished within specific workplaces and communities.…”
Section: Approaches To Studying Organizational Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressively, more scholars (Lambert-Graham 2007;Schnurr et al 2007;Spencer-Oatey 2007;Holmes et al 2008;Locher 2008;Locher and Langlotz 2008;Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2009Angouri and Tseliga 2010;Haugh 2010;Planchenault 2010;Upadhyay 2010) have striven to include identity in models of im/politeness. Furthermore, the discursive turn, with its focus on hearers' assessments of im/politeness, has consistently unveiled that the identity that hearers co-construct for speakers has a fundamental impact on whether their discourse is assessed as im/polite (e.g., Haugh 2010).…”
Section: Face Identity and Im/politenessmentioning
confidence: 99%