2016
DOI: 10.1111/emre.12083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being Different, But Close: How and When Faultlines Enhance Team Learning

Abstract: Although work‐group diversity may have potential positive impact on team learning and performance, the way diversity characteristics are distributed, influences whether teams exploit this potential. In this quantitative field study on 52 teams in two health‐care organizations, we examined the relationship between informational faultlines (the demographic alignment of the informational characteristics of the members in a group, creating relatively homogeneous subgroups) and team learning. We used a moderated‐me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(125 reference statements)
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shared cognitions. A smaller number of six studies focused on the relationship between team learning and shared cognitions, including transactive memory systems (Cabeza Pullés et al, 2013;Rupert et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018), mutually shared cognitions (Vangrieken et al, 2016;Veestraeten et al, 2014), and shared temporal cognitions (Abrantes et al, 2018). Overall, Table 3 illustrates a large and robust correlation between shared cognition and team learning (r = .62, Z = 11.96, p = .00), along with a high percentage of heterogeneity between and within studies (I 2 = 82.85%, τ = 0.21; PI lower = 0.25, PI upper = 0.83), explaining around 38% of variance.…”
Section: Rq1: Emergent States As Drivers Of Team Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared cognitions. A smaller number of six studies focused on the relationship between team learning and shared cognitions, including transactive memory systems (Cabeza Pullés et al, 2013;Rupert et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2018), mutually shared cognitions (Vangrieken et al, 2016;Veestraeten et al, 2014), and shared temporal cognitions (Abrantes et al, 2018). Overall, Table 3 illustrates a large and robust correlation between shared cognition and team learning (r = .62, Z = 11.96, p = .00), along with a high percentage of heterogeneity between and within studies (I 2 = 82.85%, τ = 0.21; PI lower = 0.25, PI upper = 0.83), explaining around 38% of variance.…”
Section: Rq1: Emergent States As Drivers Of Team Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore contend that it is time to go beyond looking at diversity as an asset vs. a liability, and rather focus on a better understanding of what affects the ability of teams to reap the benefits of diversity to perform. In line with this, we here focus on factors that support positive effects of team diversity (Joshi and Roh, ; Rupert et al, ). Specifically, we investigate openness to diversity, as well as its joint effect with team gender composition on team performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By following recent studies in the organizational behavior literature (e.g., Hill, Aime, & Ridge, 2017;Stuart, 2017;Swider, Liu, Harris, & Gardner, 2017), we test our theorizing with archival sports data from male national soccer teams. With our study, we contribute to the literature by answering calls for research on the conditions under which faultlines may yield desirable consequences (e.g., Rupert, Blomme, Dragt, & Jehn, 2016;Thatcher & Patel, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%