2020
DOI: 10.1177/1466138120907345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Being (co-)present: Reflecting the personal and public spheres of asylum seeking in relation to connectivity

Abstract: This article links the personal use/meaning of information and communications technology for refugees and asylum seekers with their visibility/invisibility in public spaces. More precisely, it gives insights into how the personal and public spheres of asylum seeking interrelate when discussing connectivity. In doing so, I discuss the following research questions: How is connectivity embedded in refugees and asylum seekers’ everyday practices? And in addition, in which ways does this personal dimension interact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the research highlighted in this section is not only from high‐income countries, but also focuses on populations who have the necessary documentation to set up mobile phone and internet accounts and use municipal services. While there are examples of border, immigration and telecommunications regulations combining to exclude migrants in high income countries (e.g., Lintner, 2020), they tend to be magnified in developing countries where immigration and telecommunications laws change often and are not coordinated with migrants in mind (Eppler et al, 2020; Martin‐Shields & Munir‐Asen, 2020).…”
Section: Icts and E‐government In Urban Migrants’ And Refugees’ Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the research highlighted in this section is not only from high‐income countries, but also focuses on populations who have the necessary documentation to set up mobile phone and internet accounts and use municipal services. While there are examples of border, immigration and telecommunications regulations combining to exclude migrants in high income countries (e.g., Lintner, 2020), they tend to be magnified in developing countries where immigration and telecommunications laws change often and are not coordinated with migrants in mind (Eppler et al, 2020; Martin‐Shields & Munir‐Asen, 2020).…”
Section: Icts and E‐government In Urban Migrants’ And Refugees’ Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars that explore theories on the social impacts of ICTs, especially those focusing on refugees (e.g. Gough & Gough, 2019;Kaufmann, 2018;Kutscher & Kress, 2018;Lintner, 2020), must necessarily engage the social and cultural factors to properly conceptualize the meaning of their findings (something we admittedly do not do within the context of this particular study). Future research in this domain should explicitly examine the social and cultural factors that underlie the social impacts of ICTs to better understand their differential impacts.…”
Section: Gender and The Relationship Between Collective Behaviors And Sense Of Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These impacts are the result of ICT's capacity to fulfill functions in social spaces that are limited or absent for refugees. Providing the means for transnational connection fulfills a void of control over one's life (Gough and Gough, 2019) or compensating for numerous spheres of social activity such as learning or interaction (Lintner, 2020). As this implies, community and social level impacts of ICTs are likewise present, as noted in Kaufmann's (2018) study of Syrian refugees in Vienna.…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 In this article, we extend the concept of affordances, or individual-level uses of ICTs, to the refugee policy level, using an empirical framework based on the concept of refugee self-reliance in urban settings. Self-reliance is particularly salient for urban refugees since they live outside the formal administration of camp settings and end up having to meet their own needs through formal and informal economic and social activities (UNHCR 2009). Extending the concept of affordances to understand the concept of refugee self-reliance allows us to ask the question: Do ICT affordances support urban refugees’ self-reliance in Kuala Lumpur and Penang, Malaysia, a middle-income refugee host country?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%