Being, Becoming and the Undivided Universe: A Dialogue Between Relational Blockworld and the Implicate Order Concerning the Unification of Relativity and Quantum Theory

Abstract

In this paper two different approaches to unification will be compared, Relational Blockworld (RBW) and Hiley's implicate order. Both approaches are monistic in that they attempt to derive matter and spacetime geometry 'at once' in an interdependent and background independent fashion from something underneath both quantum theory and relativity. Hiley's monism resides in the implicate order via Clifford algebras and is based on process as fundamental while RBW's monism resides in spacetimematter via path integrals over graphs whereby space, time and matter are co-constructed per a global constraint equation. RBW's monism therefore resides in being (relational blockworld) while that of Hiley's resides in becoming (elementary processes). Regarding the derivation of quantum theory and relativity, the promises and pitfalls of both approaches will be elaborated. Finally, special attention will be paid as to how Hiley's process account might avoid the

How Does an Entity Acquire Identity? Reassembling Relativistic Physics with Actor-Network Theory

“…If an event can be said to be present, past, or future according to a specific frame of reference, the argument reads, this is because there is no preferred or global "now" based on which events can be univocally ordered as previous, simultaneous, and successive. The metaphysical counterpart to this physical view states that the universe is to be visualized as a "block" in which all events are given once and for all-this position being termed "the block view" (for a thorough discussion on the topic see, e.g., Petkov (2006), Savitt (2002), Silberstein et al (2012)). Any such sequence of events acquires an order in terms of pastness, presentness, and futureness only locally-which is to say, indexically, from a specific perspective-while the same events can be ordered in different sequences from different perspectives.…”

Quantum Mechanics Interpretation on Planck Scale

“…In this direction, we find that the "synchronic" approaches typical of the last Bohm one and the more recent ones based on the time-reversal have recently been taken up by different groups with different nuances. It seems that there cannot be any easy "peaceful coexistence" between Relativity and QM, even under the hypothesis that both are emerging [85][86][87]. As N. Gisin and A. Suarez said, the non-locality seems "something is coming from the outside space and time".…”

Explaining the Supernova Data Without Accelerating Expansion

“…That is, perhaps general relativity (GR) is only an approximation to the correct classical theory of gravity, as evidenced by the supernova data. We were motivated to consider this possibility by our work on foundational issues [18][19] [20], so this was not an ad hoc response to the supernova data. Since our foundational method employs a graphical path integral approach to quantum physics, we are motivated to pursue and modify a graphical, least action approach to GR, i.e., Regge calculus[21] [22][23] [24].…”