2017
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beighton scores and cut-offs across the lifespan: cross-sectional study of an Australian population

Abstract: Beighton scores varied across the lifespan and were significantly influenced by age, sex and ethnicity. Assessing GJH using the Beighton scoring system required age- and sex-specific cut-off scores based on the uppermost 5% values. This was confirmed by the low sensitivity, high specificity and 60% false-positive rate if a cut-off of ⩾4 was used for both sexes across the lifespan. To lower the risk of a false-positive diagnosis of GJH, further tests of hypermobility need to be utilized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
77
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Hypermobility was assessed using nine tests to create a Beighton Score (from 0 to 9) with five or more indicating hypermobility ( 6 ). General joint hypermobility according to cutoff values stated by Singh was identified ( 7 ). Neurological assessment was done using discomfort drawings and quantitative sensory testing (QST).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hypermobility was assessed using nine tests to create a Beighton Score (from 0 to 9) with five or more indicating hypermobility ( 6 ). General joint hypermobility according to cutoff values stated by Singh was identified ( 7 ). Neurological assessment was done using discomfort drawings and quantitative sensory testing (QST).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurological assessment was done using discomfort drawings and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Discomfort drawings were assessed for pattern of neuropathic pain and pattern of widespread pain ( 7 ). QST was performed using an electronic device, the Somedic® algometer, to establish the threshold for skin pressure pain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clinical judgment was based on a comprehensive history, the validated five-part historical hypermobility questionnaire [ 16 ], Beighton score, and the physical assessment of peripheral joints, not using the LLAS. Cut-off scores of ≥4/9 and ≥5/9 on the Beighton score were used for men and women respectively in the control and known hypermobile cohorts [ 2 ]. A higher score of ≥6/9 was considered GJH in the likely hypermobile cohort to account for the debated palms to floor measure in dancers [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypermobility is present when a joint’s active or passive range exceeds that expected for an individual’s age, gender and ethnicity [ 1 ]. To be truly hypermobile, the range should, by definition, be in the uppermost 5% of the population [ 2 ]. Hypermobility may be localised to select joints or present in multiple body areas (typically greater than five sites) as Generalised Joint Hypermobility (GJH) [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies were recently published that reported on the clinimetric properties of physical assessments for measuring GJH. 7 , 8 One of these studies concerned the 12-item Lower Limb Assessment Score (LLAS), 7 as mentioned in the letter by Nicholson and Chan. Hypermobility may be located all over the body in the case of GJH; therefore, the LLAS was designed to study GJH of the lower extremity of adults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%