2005
DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0305-34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behind the Hockey Stick

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carbon dioxide increased gradually until 1900, when greenhouse gases and global temperatures began to skyrocket, as shown in Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph included with the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) summary for policymakers (Appell, 2005). Fast forward to the summer of 2012, by which time half of the Arctic sea ice had vanished.…”
Section: Herstory: Women's Climate Change Activismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Carbon dioxide increased gradually until 1900, when greenhouse gases and global temperatures began to skyrocket, as shown in Michael Mann's "hockey stick" graph included with the 2001 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) summary for policymakers (Appell, 2005). Fast forward to the summer of 2012, by which time half of the Arctic sea ice had vanished.…”
Section: Herstory: Women's Climate Change Activismmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The image became something of a synecdoche for the increasingly politicized nature of climate change science. The magazine Scientific American claimed ‘take down Mann [via the disputed image], it seemed, and the rest of the IPCC's conclusions about anthropogenic climate change would follow’ . :34 Controversy has also followed other ostensibly ‘scientific’ images, such as Al Gore's graphic representation of carbon dioxide emissions, and of the IPCC's ‘burning embers’ diagram …”
Section: The Moment Of the Visual Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Response 2: Return GHG level in the atmosphere to that before anthropogenic interference. Not only stabilisation of, but also reduction from, the current GHG content of the atmosphere is preferable because reaching the present level has already committed the Earth from 50 to 100 years of warming and several centuries of sea-level rise [53]. To go further and restore atmosphere to long-term background (pre-industrial) level requires CO 2 capture from the air [54].…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%