Behind the Black Box: The Evidence for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Warning about the Risk of General Anesthesia in Children Younger than 3 Years
Abstract:On December 14, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a Drug Safety Communication warning "that repeated or lengthy use of general anesthetic and sedation drugs during surgeries or procedures in children younger than 3 years or in pregnant women during their third trimester may affect the development of children's brains." Health care professionals were urged to "balance the benefits of appropriate anesthesia in young children and pregnant women against the potential risks, especially for procedur… Show more
“…FODO's shorter operative time, even with addition of the second procedure for device removal, represents an advantage given the recent trend towards decreasing anesthetic exposure during the first several years of life. 12 It was also associated with less estimated blood loss, and lower blood product transfusion with a trend toward a decrease in hospital stay. Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis mediated reconstruction allows surgery to be performed at an earlier age which may be beneficial in order to ameliorate issues associated with increased intracranial pressure, including the poorly understood effects it may have on neuropsychological outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data presented in this study supports a favorable perioperative profile for the correction of UCS with both treatment modalities. FODO's shorter operative time, even with addition of the second procedure for device removal, represents an advantage given the recent trend towards decreasing anesthetic exposure during the first several years of life 12 . It was also associated with less estimated blood loss, and lower blood product transfusion with a trend toward a decrease in hospital stay.…”
Background:The purpose of this prospective study is to compare perioperative morbidity and strabismus rates between traditional fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction (FOAR) and frontoorbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS). Method: A consecutive group of 15 patients undergoing FODO for isolated UCS were compared to a contemporaneous group of 15 patients undergoing traditional FOAR for UCS. Patient age, operative time, blood loss, blood replacement, technical details of the surgery, length of stay, complications, and strabismus rates were documented and compared statistically using chi-square and Student t test with a significance value of 0.05. Results: The 15 patients undergoing FODO were younger (6.3 and 9.8 months, P < 0.05), experienced less operative time for the initial procedure (111 versus 190 minutes, P < 0.01), less blood loss (26% versus 50% of total blood volume, P < 0.01), and less blood replacement (40% versus 60% of total blood volume, P < 0.05). One patient in the FODO group experienced a new-onset strabismus postoperatively compared with 5 in the FOAR group (P < 0.05). There were no complications requiring a return to the operating room in either group. Conclusions: Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of isolated UCS is associated with a favorable perioperative morbidity profile and a decreased incidence of postoperative strabismus compared with traditional FOAR. These positive factors are tempered by the need for an additional procedure for removal of the device and lack of long-term outcomes data on the technique.
“…FODO's shorter operative time, even with addition of the second procedure for device removal, represents an advantage given the recent trend towards decreasing anesthetic exposure during the first several years of life. 12 It was also associated with less estimated blood loss, and lower blood product transfusion with a trend toward a decrease in hospital stay. Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis mediated reconstruction allows surgery to be performed at an earlier age which may be beneficial in order to ameliorate issues associated with increased intracranial pressure, including the poorly understood effects it may have on neuropsychological outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The data presented in this study supports a favorable perioperative profile for the correction of UCS with both treatment modalities. FODO's shorter operative time, even with addition of the second procedure for device removal, represents an advantage given the recent trend towards decreasing anesthetic exposure during the first several years of life 12 . It was also associated with less estimated blood loss, and lower blood product transfusion with a trend toward a decrease in hospital stay.…”
Background:The purpose of this prospective study is to compare perioperative morbidity and strabismus rates between traditional fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction (FOAR) and frontoorbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS). Method: A consecutive group of 15 patients undergoing FODO for isolated UCS were compared to a contemporaneous group of 15 patients undergoing traditional FOAR for UCS. Patient age, operative time, blood loss, blood replacement, technical details of the surgery, length of stay, complications, and strabismus rates were documented and compared statistically using chi-square and Student t test with a significance value of 0.05. Results: The 15 patients undergoing FODO were younger (6.3 and 9.8 months, P < 0.05), experienced less operative time for the initial procedure (111 versus 190 minutes, P < 0.01), less blood loss (26% versus 50% of total blood volume, P < 0.01), and less blood replacement (40% versus 60% of total blood volume, P < 0.05). One patient in the FODO group experienced a new-onset strabismus postoperatively compared with 5 in the FOAR group (P < 0.05). There were no complications requiring a return to the operating room in either group. Conclusions: Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of isolated UCS is associated with a favorable perioperative morbidity profile and a decreased incidence of postoperative strabismus compared with traditional FOAR. These positive factors are tempered by the need for an additional procedure for removal of the device and lack of long-term outcomes data on the technique.
“…Since the late 1990s, different studies correlating anesthetics with neurotoxicity and neurocognitive sequelae in animal models have been carried out. 13 Data obtained in animal and in vitro studies showed that under experimental conditions, all general anesthetics, including γ-aminobutyric acid agonists and N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists, have immediate neuroanatomical consequences, 14 such as apoptotic neurodegeneration. 15 However, extrapolating animal research results to humans is still a challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with syndactyly usually require surgical intervention at an early age, and much is discussed about the potential implications of exposure to anesthetic agents in childhood. Since the late 1990s, different studies correlating anesthetics with neurotoxicity and neurocognitive sequelae in animal models have been carried out 13 . Data obtained in animal and in vitro studies showed that under experimental conditions, all general anesthetics, including γ-aminobutyric acid agonists and N -methyl- d -aspartate antagonists, have immediate neuroanatomical consequences, 14 such as apoptotic neurodegeneration 15 .…”
IntroductionSyndactyly has a cosmetic, functional, and psychosocial impact, and surgical treatment is indicated in most cases. This study aimed to retrospectively identify whether patients undergoing surgical release of syndactyly younger than 1 year presented different results compared with those operated older than 1 year.MethodsPatients were assessed through photographic records by 3 independent specialist surgeons for the quality of scar, presence of web creep, rotational, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion deformities using the Withey score.ResultsThirty-four patients were included in the study, totaling 51 commissures operated. The score was higher in the group operated younger than 1 year (5.83 ± 2.39) compared with the group older than 1 year (3.94 ± 1.93), being statistically significant, with a P value of 0.011.ConclusionsChildren with syndactyly operated younger than 1 year have worse postoperative outcomes measured by the Withey score than those operated older than 1 year.
“…Researchers have focused on the development of less invasive tools to evaluate esophagus inflammation, since upper endoscopy is an invasive and expensive procedure, even requiring general anesthesia in children and conscious sedation in most adult patients. Moreover, in 2016, the Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning states that “repeated or lengthy use of general anesthetic and sedation drugs during surgeries or procedures in children younger than 3 years or in pregnant women during their third trimester may affect the development of children’s brains”, caused increase concerns over anesthetic exposure at a young age leading to anesthetic-induced neurotoxicity [ 99 , 100 ]. Since then, more caution has been used to do repeated EGD under anesthesia.…”
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic clinical-pathologic disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal epithelium with esophageal dysfunction symptoms.EoE can occur at any age and has different clinical manifestations depending on the age onset.To date, esophago-gastroduodenal endoscopy (EGD) with biopsy is the gold-standard for EoE diagnosis.According to the recent consensus guidelines, proton pump inhibitors, corticosteroids and elimination diets could be a first-line therapy option. The aim of the treatment is clinical and histological remission for preventing long-lasting untreatable fibrosis.A multidisciplinary approach (allergist, gastroenterology, dietitian, and pathologist) is recommended for managing patients affected by EoE, given the complexity of its treatment.This review will provide a practical guide to assist pediatricians treating children with EoE.Moreover, it highlights the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment that require urgent attention from the scientific community in the aim of improving the management of patients with EoE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.