1996
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61629-2_55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural specifications in type theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Important issues in algebraic specification refinement, such as the choice of input sorts [36] and the stability of constructors [39,37,10], are automatically resolved in the type-theoretic setting. Other work linking algebraic specification and type theory includes [28,34,2,41,40]. Relevant work using System F and parametricity includes [29,30] showing that the introduction of non-terminating recursion also breaks down the tight correspondence between the existence of a simulation relation and observational equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important issues in algebraic specification refinement, such as the choice of input sorts [36] and the stability of constructors [39,37,10], are automatically resolved in the type-theoretic setting. Other work linking algebraic specification and type theory includes [28,34,2,41,40]. Relevant work using System F and parametricity includes [29,30] showing that the introduction of non-terminating recursion also breaks down the tight correspondence between the existence of a simulation relation and observational equivalence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%