2004
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2004.11682839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural responses of moose to thermal conditions in the boreal forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
126
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the moose road crossing frequency tend to peak in early morning and in the evening (Rolandsen et al 2010), indicating that even small changes in the timing of the main activity period can lead to substantially higher accident rate. In Canada, Dussault et al (2006) found more moose to be killed on roads in warm summer days and speculated that moose under such conditions compensated by being more active during the night time when temperatures were lower, but the driving conditions less good (Dussault et al 2004). The traffic volume may also be related to temperature, e.g., more people may be travelling in years of warm summers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the moose road crossing frequency tend to peak in early morning and in the evening (Rolandsen et al 2010), indicating that even small changes in the timing of the main activity period can lead to substantially higher accident rate. In Canada, Dussault et al (2006) found more moose to be killed on roads in warm summer days and speculated that moose under such conditions compensated by being more active during the night time when temperatures were lower, but the driving conditions less good (Dussault et al 2004). The traffic volume may also be related to temperature, e.g., more people may be travelling in years of warm summers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though Conifer was avoided, because of its abundance on the landscape it was still used often. Poole and Smith (2006) reported that moose selected higher crown closure at the landscape scale, whereas others have observed selection by moose for conifer stands at finer scales related to thermal cover (McNicol and Gilbert 1978), forage diversity (Peek 1997), and predation risk (Bowyer et al 1999, Dussault et al 2004, Bjomeraas et al 2011. Throughout most of the year, male and female moose selected for shrub-dominated land-cover (i.e., Upland Shrub, Riparian, or Lowland Shrub).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an admittedly simple perspective on forest succession, but it serves to demonstrate that, operating from an average landscape composition perspective as we do here, increasing annual timber harvest may not coincide with an immediate increase in deciduous cover, but effectively immediate removal of forest habitat from the landscape. Given that all v www.esajournals.org forested stands have at least some value to moose, for example as forage habitat (Peek et al 1976, Stephenson et al 2006, predatory cover (Stephens andPeterson 1984, Dussault et al 2005), or thermal cover (Dussault et al 2004, van Beest et al 2012, it is reasonable that increasing the average annual timber harvest would depress estimated carrying capacity within wildlife management units. Timber harvest may thus depress moose abundance both indirectly through increased mortality due to improved hunting efficiency by humans and natural predators and directly through changes to the distribution and abundance of forest stands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%