2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11030685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural Interventions in People with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials

Abstract: Objective: To determine the effects of behavioural interventions in people with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Methods: Systematic literature searches were conducted to retrieve randomized controlled trials in four different databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and PubMed). The methodological quality of eligible articles was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2), after which meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 37 studies were in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the clinical effects of CTAR exercise in stroke survivors and confirm that CTAR exercise has superior effects than Shaker exercise in post-stroke dysphagia rehabilitation. The main results are consistent with a previous systematic review, which compared the effects of CTAR exercise in improving swallowing safety compared with no exercise intervention ( 47 ). But they did not compare oral intake ability and the effect of CTAR with Shaker exercise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the clinical effects of CTAR exercise in stroke survivors and confirm that CTAR exercise has superior effects than Shaker exercise in post-stroke dysphagia rehabilitation. The main results are consistent with a previous systematic review, which compared the effects of CTAR exercise in improving swallowing safety compared with no exercise intervention ( 47 ). But they did not compare oral intake ability and the effect of CTAR with Shaker exercise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Nursing planning/intervention, identified by nursing diagnosis, is any treatment that a nurse performs to enhance patient outcomes. Behavioural interventions show promising effects in patients with PSD, which is in keeping with the results of a recent meta‐analysis (Speyer et al, 2022). Behavioural interventions, including bolus modification and management (Newman et al, 2016), motor behavioural techniques or oromotor exercises (Hwang et al, 2019), general body and head postural adjustments (Park et al, 2019), and swallowing manoeuvres (Mepani et al, 2009), may be the most widespread treatment approach for patients with PSD globally (Dziewas et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“… 40 , 44 , 45 The meta-analysis evaluated the effects of 3 RCTs 40 , 41 , 43 and revealed a large pooled treatment effect. 46 However, it should be noted that the small number of published RCTs are heterogeneous with respect to their CTAR treatment regimens which makes comparisons between studies challenging and their amalgamation as part of a meta-analysis imperfect.…”
Section: Rehabilitative Exercisesmentioning
confidence: 99%