1978
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3908(78)90148-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural and neurochemical effects of repeated administration of cocaine in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1C). As expected (Roy et al, 1978), cocaine dramatically increased rearing. Interestingly, the pattern of rearing behavior across weeks differed between males and females.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…1C). As expected (Roy et al, 1978), cocaine dramatically increased rearing. Interestingly, the pattern of rearing behavior across weeks differed between males and females.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…␣-MSH infu- sions into the brains of cocaine-treated rats induced a significant increase in locomotor activity, and this activity was maintained throughout a 1-h test period. Although cocaine alone is known to induce substantial locomotor activity immediately after administration (Post and Rose, 1976;Roy et al, 1978), we tested animals 3 h after drug treatment, when the locomotor-activating effects are no longer exhibited (Post and Rose, 1976). The results of the current investigation are consistent with previous reports and demonstrate that animals receiving repeated cocaine and then receiving an acute saline infusion (i.c.v.)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Because sensitization to cocaine can be seen after even a single pretreatment (O'Neill and Sanger, 1999), changes in pharmacokinetics may not be of primary importance when considering whether sensitization develops or not. However, it could play a role in the increasing magnitude of sensitization seen with multiple drug exposures (Kalivas and Duffy, 1990;Roy et al, 1978).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%