1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf03186268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural analysis of feeding and breeding in Orthopteran insects

Abstract: Various aspects of the feeding and breeding behaviours in Orthoptera with special reference to Acridoidea and Tetrigoidea are discussed. The changes in the incisor and molar mandibular surfaces, laciniae and galeae of the maxillae, in relation to graminivory, herbivory and omnivory are cited as specific manifestations of the feeding behaviour. Similarly, in sharp contrast to Acridoids the rather poor foregut armature and small and compact feculae in Tetrigoids is suggested as an evidence indicating the correla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, pygmy grasshoppers did not appear to be associated with the vegetation types in the swamp forest since their food sources were often not affected by the vegetation types (Paranjape 1985, Paranjape andBhalerao 1985). This is contrary to previous studies showing diet preference of orthopterans is often closely linked to their association with specific vegetation or host plants (Joern 1982, Schaffers et al 2008, Badenhausser et al 2015, although these studies do not focus on pygmy grasshop-Journal of orthoptera research 2017, 26(1) pers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…On the other hand, pygmy grasshoppers did not appear to be associated with the vegetation types in the swamp forest since their food sources were often not affected by the vegetation types (Paranjape 1985, Paranjape andBhalerao 1985). This is contrary to previous studies showing diet preference of orthopterans is often closely linked to their association with specific vegetation or host plants (Joern 1982, Schaffers et al 2008, Badenhausser et al 2015, although these studies do not focus on pygmy grasshop-Journal of orthoptera research 2017, 26(1) pers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The comsrehensive descristion sresented here of the recisrocal interactions between the sexes in the desert locust thus contributes to our understanding of the biology and behavior of this economically significant sest. The described and sresented ethogram offers a tool with which to comsare behavioral similarities and differences among different orthosteran insects (Paranjase 1985), and ssecifically among locust ssecies. Here we exclusively described the sexual behavior of the desert locust in the gregarious shase.…”
Section: Concluding Reoarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manuscript to be reviewed mate recognition and sexual conflict (Paranjase 1985;Curkovic et al 2006;Cozzie & Irby 2010;Gaertner et al 2015), and ssecifically so in agricultural sests (Walgenbach & Burkholder 1987;Rojas et al 1990;Wang & Millar 2000;Zahn et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 425 comprehensive description presented here of the reciprocal interactions between the sexes in the 426 desert locust thus contributes to our understanding of the biology and behavior of this economically 427 significant pest. The described and presentrd ethogram offers a tool with which to compare behavioral 428 similarities and differences among different orthopteran insects (Paranjape 1985), and specifically 429 among locust species. Here we exclusively described the sexual behavior of the desert locust in the 430 gregarious phase.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks 423mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification can be aided by using a Markovian chain, also known as a transition matrix 65 (Castrovillo and Cardé 1980;Haynes and Birch 1984). The knowledge gained may contribute not only 66 to deciphering evolutionary relationships between taxa, as in host-parasite interactions, but also to the 67 understanding of mate recognition and sexual conflicts (Paranjape 1985;Curkovic et al 2006; Cozzie & 68 Irby 2010; Gaertner et al 2015), and specifically so in agricultural pests (Walgenbach & Burkholder 69 1987; Rojas et al 1990; Wang & Millar 2000;Zahn et al 2008). 70…”
Section: Introduction 44mentioning
confidence: 99%