2018
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0261
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of nonhuman primate mothers toward their dead infants: uncovering mechanisms

Abstract: In comparative thanatology, most reports for nonhuman mammals concern mothers' behavioural responses to their dead offspring: most prominently, dead-infant carrying (sometimes of extended duration); but also inspection, proximity, maternal care such as grooming, protective behaviours and filial cannibalism. Documented across many primate species, these behaviours remain poorly understood in all. The literature is dominated by relatively brief qualitative descriptions of isolated anecdotal cases in apes and mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
126
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
126
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In two of those cases, the infant died shortly after birth, the mother was still alive and the corpse was handled by a third individual, who provided greater post-mortem care than the mother. It has been argued that the lack of a strong bond if an infant dies soon after birth can result in decreased responsiveness of the mother to her infant [8]. However, our data contradict this interpretation of the social-bonds hypothesis: one mother showed extensive carrying of her neonate's corpse (Case 6), and two stillborn foetuses were also carried for several days, with both mothers appearing distressed at losing the corpse (Cases 1 and 5).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In two of those cases, the infant died shortly after birth, the mother was still alive and the corpse was handled by a third individual, who provided greater post-mortem care than the mother. It has been argued that the lack of a strong bond if an infant dies soon after birth can result in decreased responsiveness of the mother to her infant [8]. However, our data contradict this interpretation of the social-bonds hypothesis: one mother showed extensive carrying of her neonate's corpse (Case 6), and two stillborn foetuses were also carried for several days, with both mothers appearing distressed at losing the corpse (Cases 1 and 5).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…What are the evolutionary origins of human mortuary practices and the awareness of mortality [4]?Most descriptions of animals' responses to death are anecdotal, and have focused on mothers' responses to the death of their infant ([3], for reviews of other cases, see [5][6][7]). This focus is circumstantial rather than a reflection of the putative importance of this particular behaviour for understanding responses to death: these cases are more frequently observed because of high infant mortality and the greater ability of mothers, particularly primates, to transport relatively small-bodied individuals after death [8]. Nonetheless, these records have been informative, with notable variation described in both individuals' and species' behaviour towards dead infants [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some hypotheses have been proposed to explain post‐mortem carrying (Table ), it is still a matter of debate which one offers the most powerful explanation. Because some are mutually non‐exclusive it is likely that many factors, depending on context, contribute to these behaviours (see Watson & Matsuzawa, ).…”
Section: Primate Thanatology: Contemporary Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexperienced Japanese macaque mothers have been observed to inadvertently drown their infants when diving into the hot springs of Jigokudani Park for food (de Waal, ) and similar occurrences have been reported among baboons (Cheney & Seyfarth, ). Moreover, filial cannibalism during post‐mortem carrying has also been witnessed, suggesting that corpses may be re‐categorised as food (Altmann, ; Hsiang‐Jen & Hsiu‐Hui, ; Dellatore, Waitt & Foitova, ; Watson et al , ; Tian et al , ; Tokuyama et al , ; De Marco, Cozzolino & Thierry, ; Watson & Matsuzawa, ).…”
Section: Primate Thanatology: Contemporary Reportsmentioning
confidence: 99%