2020
DOI: 10.1680/jgrim.18.00082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of geosynthetic in anchored geosynthetic-reinforced slopes subjected to seepage

Abstract: The anchored geosynthetic system (AGS) is a technique to improve the stability of unstable or quasi-stable slopes. In this study, the behaviour of geosynthetic in slopes reinforced with AGS subjected to seepage is investigated. Centrifuge model tests were carried out at 50g centrifuge acceleration on silty sand slopes with an inclination of 63·4° (2V:1H) and reinforced with AGS. Seepage was generated by gradually raising the water table within the reinforced slope models. By means of a digital image analysis t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have utilised foam sheets, particularly on the front and back boundaries of model walls, to address this shortcoming [86][87][88]. In contrast, others have employed glycerin or petroleum jelly to limit the friction between slope material and container walls [89,90]. It is worth noting that the use of mixed container boundaries (a combination of flexible band rigid boundaries) on selected sides poses concerns about the biased orientation of failure plane development and progression which is towards the flexible boundaries [91].…”
Section: Model Containers and Materials Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some studies have utilised foam sheets, particularly on the front and back boundaries of model walls, to address this shortcoming [86][87][88]. In contrast, others have employed glycerin or petroleum jelly to limit the friction between slope material and container walls [89,90]. It is worth noting that the use of mixed container boundaries (a combination of flexible band rigid boundaries) on selected sides poses concerns about the biased orientation of failure plane development and progression which is towards the flexible boundaries [91].…”
Section: Model Containers and Materials Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λ = 25), density (C ρ = 1), and elasticity modulus (C E = 25). In another study by Guo et al [90], they predicted failure surface using centrifuge model tests on soil slope anchored with a geosynthetic system under seepage conditions. Soil strength parameters (cohesion and internal friction angle) and coefficient of permeability were the fundamental parameters, and their scaling coefficients were adopted from the work by Rajabian et al [105], which was N = 1.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation