2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of Escherichia coli strains during semi-hard and hard raw milk cheese production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the STEC in cheese rinds remained relatively similar to the one in cheese cores with a slow decrease during the storage step (water activity slowly decreased during this step but remained above 0.96 whereas pH increased to reach 6.5 at d 56). For each strain, the level of STEC was generally higher in rinds than in cores, as observed previously (Peng et al, 2013b); higher pH values can explain this observation. Significant differences between cores and rinds were observed during the entire ripening and storage steps (P < 0.05) for the STEC strains belonging to the serotypes O103:H2 and O157:H7, but only at the end of the storage step for the STEC strains belonging to the serotypes O26:H11 and O145:H28.…”
Section: Short Communicationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The behavior of the STEC in cheese rinds remained relatively similar to the one in cheese cores with a slow decrease during the storage step (water activity slowly decreased during this step but remained above 0.96 whereas pH increased to reach 6.5 at d 56). For each strain, the level of STEC was generally higher in rinds than in cores, as observed previously (Peng et al, 2013b); higher pH values can explain this observation. Significant differences between cores and rinds were observed during the entire ripening and storage steps (P < 0.05) for the STEC strains belonging to the serotypes O103:H2 and O157:H7, but only at the end of the storage step for the STEC strains belonging to the serotypes O26:H11 and O145:H28.…”
Section: Short Communicationsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…by Ross et al (2003). Only sporadically, the challenge tests were performed to evaluate behaviour of simple saprophytic E. coli populations during commercial production of semi-hard and hard raw milk cheese (Peng et al, 2013). Our ambition for this study was to investigate the effects of LAB used as a starter culture to limit potential growth of E. coli during milk acidification and thus prevent from its unacceptable increase prior to ripening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primers, sequences, and parameters for amplification of virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in E. coli isolates by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). ATAAAATTCTTGAAGACGAAA GACAGTTACCAATGCTTAATCA [42], [47] blaSHV blaSHV SHV-F SHV-R 19 19 50 885…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%