2021
DOI: 10.1680/jmacr.19.00121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of confined rubberised concrete members under combined loading conditions

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental study into the fundamental response of reinforced concrete members, incorporating rubber particles obtained from recycled tyres, subjected to combined axialbending loading conditions. Tests on confined circular members with and without internal hoops or external FRP sheets are described. The results show that the rubber particles enhance the confinement level activated, with confined-to-unconfined strength and deformation capacity ratios at least two folds those of conventio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this study, which has been lacking to date, regarding the fundamental cyclic properties of unconfined RuC materials, show that RuC can be used in expected plastic hinge zones of flexural members. On the other hand, for RRuC members with high axial loads such as column members, external confinement such as using steel tubes or FRP jackets [15,27,36,69,70], are required. However, for detailed numerical modelling of confined RuC, fundamental characteristics of unconfined RuC under cyclic loading are needed as have been quantified in this paper.…”
Section: Unloading Modulus and Residual Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented in this study, which has been lacking to date, regarding the fundamental cyclic properties of unconfined RuC materials, show that RuC can be used in expected plastic hinge zones of flexural members. On the other hand, for RRuC members with high axial loads such as column members, external confinement such as using steel tubes or FRP jackets [15,27,36,69,70], are required. However, for detailed numerical modelling of confined RuC, fundamental characteristics of unconfined RuC under cyclic loading are needed as have been quantified in this paper.…”
Section: Unloading Modulus and Residual Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRP laminates were shown in previous studies to improve the capacity of RuC members under combined compression and bending loading and to provide high rotation capacity compared with RRuC members with internal stirrup confinement [7]. The capacity of FRP-confined RuC was between two to four times higher than unconfined RuC when the rubber content was 30% and 60%, respectively [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The use of recycled rubber particles as partial replacements of both coarse and fine aggregates in concrete is considered a sustainable solution to reduce the detrimental impact of rubber waste on the environment [1][2][3]. RuC can be an efficient alternative to conventional concrete materials (CCM) for some applications, although RuC is characterised by a low elastic modulus, compressive capacity and tensile strength in comparison with CCM [4][5][6][7][8]. Rubberised concrete (RuC) has the potential for being used in structural applications and has good performance in terms of ductility, energy dissipation, durability, and sound insulation [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%