2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of composite floors with different sizes of edge beams in fire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cracking moment was more susceptible to temperature rise, due to the sensitive nature of the tensile strength of concrete. The research outcome is also a factor of the original material properties and the dimension of the cross-section [28]; the model could hence be expanded to accommodate the variables within this corridor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cracking moment was more susceptible to temperature rise, due to the sensitive nature of the tensile strength of concrete. The research outcome is also a factor of the original material properties and the dimension of the cross-section [28]; the model could hence be expanded to accommodate the variables within this corridor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that failure modes of the slab depend on reinforcement layout, aspect ratio and boundary condition. Nguyen and Tan [20] conducted experiments on three one quarter scale composite slabs with different bending stiffnesses of protected edge beams under fire conditions. The results showed that an increase of the edge beam bending stiffness initially reduced the deflection.…”
Section: Figure 1: Tensile Membrane Action Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After investigations on the accidental fire incident at Broadgate (The Steel Construction Institute, 1991) and the large scale tests at Cardington (British Steel, 1997), slabs were found to sustain their load resistance by developing tensile membrane action (TMA). Indeed, the discovery of this load path invigorated a new path of structural-fire research concerned with the factors contributing to the emergence of this mechanism (Abu et al, 2012(Abu et al, , 2013Nguyen and Tan, 2017), its ultimate capacity (Burgess, 2017;Huang et al, 2003;Tan and Nguyen, 2015) and how to exploit it for design (Bailey et al, 2000(Bailey et al, , 2008Cameron and Usmani, 2005). A wealth of experimental data primarily concerned with TMA has been generated over the last two decades (Cashell et al, 2011a;Li et al, 2017;Lim and Wade, 2002;Nguyen and Tan, 2015;Vassart and Zhao, 2011), which provided a fertile environment for development and validation of numerical solution methods (Cashell et al, 2011b;Elghazouli and Izzuddin, 2004;Gillie et al, 2002;Huang et al, 1999Huang et al, , 2001Huang et al, , 2002Jiang et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2021a, b;Lim et al, 2004;Omer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the discovery of this load path invigorated a new path of structural-fire research concerned with the factors contributing to the emergence of this mechanism (Abu et al. , 2012, 2013; Nguyen and Tan, 2017), its ultimate capacity (Burgess, 2017; Huang et al. , 2003; Tan and Nguyen, 2015) and how to exploit it for design (Bailey et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%