Time depth recorders (TDRs) were attached to 3 Mediterranean monk seal pups during a range of periods around weaning, providing a composite picture of activity from the first weeks of life until nutritional independence. The pups entered the water during their first week of life and their diving performance increase progressively with age. All pups spent most of their time at sea (55 to 74%), and their swimming activity was greater at nighttime compared with daytime. Dive performance in relation to pup age was poorer compared with other phocid seal species. Dive types were classified using a combination of hierarchical and k-mean clustering. We found 3 dive types: 1 Vshaped and 2 U-shaped. The most common type was U 1 -dives, mainly used by older pups during 44 to 48% of their total dive time. These dives were relatively deep and long (mean depth = 11.6 ± 9.5 m, mean duration = 149.1 ± 80.6 s). They had long bottom times (100 ± 67 s), suggesting that pups were foraging. Pups appeared to start feeding at the end of lactation.
KEY WORDS: Mediterranean monk seal · Diving behaviour · Lactation · Weaning · Monachus monachus
Resale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisherMar Ecol Prog Ser 308: [303][304][305][306][307][308][309] 2006 son & Le Boeuf 1994, Burns & Castellini 1996, Bowen et al. 1999, Burns 1999, Hindell et al. 1999.The diving behaviour of Mediterranean monk seal pups has received little attention to date. Here we used time-depth recorders (TDRs) to study the diving behaviour of these pups from nursing to nutritional independence.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThe study was carried out in the Cabo Blanco peninsula, Western Sahara (21°02' N, 17°03' W) between July and November 1995. This area is inhabited by the only large aggregation of Mediterranean monk seals that exists today, with a total population estimated at 109 individuals (CV = 0.14; 95% CI: 86 to 145) (Forcada et al. 1999). Many individuals, including most lactating females and their pups, haul out onto the beaches and inside 2 caves, where they can be monitored easily (Gazo et al. 1999).Seals were captured using a net mounted on a metal frame (2.0 × 1.3 m) . The frame was submerged horizontally in a natural channel (1 m deep) located near the entrance of the main breeding cave. When a pup swam on the surface just over the frame, a system of pulleys and weights was activated by the researchers to move the frame to the surface, thus entangling the pup in the net. No drug or anaesthetic was used to restrain the individuals. We attached Mk-5 TDRs (Wildlife Computers) to 4 moulted pups. These recorders were fixed with plastic zip ties to a plastic base that was glued to the seal's fur. At the end of the sampling period, we recovered the TDRs by entering the caves, approaching the sleeping individuals, and cutting the plastic zip. This operation did not require a second handling of the individuals tracked. The plastic base-plate then remained glued to the back of the seal until the next moult. We recovered 3 TDRs;...