2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviors of existing twin subway tunnels due to new subway station excavation below in close vicinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Figure 24a shows rather complete monitoring data, whereas Figure 24b-d only shows the relative displacements of the surrounding rocks following excavation. It is clear from Figure 24 that the critical stage affecting the deformation of slope and surrounding rocks was the approaching phase of the tunnel face [21]. All the monitored values were lower than the corresponding simulations, of which the slope stability deformation monitoring value was about 20% lower than the simulated value, and the final stability deformation monitoring values of the tunnel surrounding rocks were all lower than the upper limits (15 mm and 20 mm) for tunnel deformation stipulated by the Land Transport Authority (2000) and Building Department (2009) [9].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the In Situ Monitoring Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Figure 24a shows rather complete monitoring data, whereas Figure 24b-d only shows the relative displacements of the surrounding rocks following excavation. It is clear from Figure 24 that the critical stage affecting the deformation of slope and surrounding rocks was the approaching phase of the tunnel face [21]. All the monitored values were lower than the corresponding simulations, of which the slope stability deformation monitoring value was about 20% lower than the simulated value, and the final stability deformation monitoring values of the tunnel surrounding rocks were all lower than the upper limits (15 mm and 20 mm) for tunnel deformation stipulated by the Land Transport Authority (2000) and Building Department (2009) [9].…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of the In Situ Monitoring Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the inspection results of double-arch tunnels in Sichuan and Chongqing, the depth or height of voids behind the lining generally ranged from 0.15 to 0.50 m, and the maximum value reached 1.09 m [19]. In practical engineering, field monitoring remains a generally recognized approach for understanding the deformation of the ground and the neighboring structures [20][21][22], whereas there are numerous voids with different sizes developed around the double-arch tunnel lining. Different arrangements and sizes of voids can change stress, deformation, and failure of the lining.…”
Section: Numerical Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the safety of tunnel construction, especially the stability of the tunnel face [1][2][3][4] and the deformation of the ground and neighboring structures [5,6], has been a research hotspot in the field of tunnel engineering. With the large-scale expansion of the Chinese Railway Network, the problems of tunnel structure damage continue to arise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%