1982
DOI: 10.1177/019874298200700310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviorally Disordered Adolescents as Peer Tutors: Immediate and Generative Effects on Instructional Performance and Spelling Achievement

Abstract: This study was a formative evaluation of a peer tutoring package. The purpose was to investigate the effects of a peer tutoring package on the instructional performance of behaviorally disordered adolescents, directly trained by their teachers, and subsequent effects on the performance of their learners. Generative effects of the peer tutoring procedures were observed in successive peer tutor-learner dyads not directly trained by teachers. This study used an across subject multiple baseline design to study pee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four studies implemented peer tutoring in the content area of reading (Csapo, 1976;Kreutzer, 1973;Lane, Pollock, & Sher, 1972;McCracken, 1979) and three focused on math, language arts, and social science (Maher, 1982;1986). Spelling was the content area taught in three of the studies (Harrigan, 1994;Hogan & Prater, 1993;Stowitschek, Hecimovic, Stowitschek, & Shores, 1982), and three additional studies examined the effects of peer tutoring on math skills (Gable & Kerr, 1980;Kane & Alley, 1980;Maheady, Sacca, & Harper, 1987). The fi nal three studies focused on improving achievement in social studies classes .…”
Section: Content Of Tutoring For High School Students With Emotional mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies implemented peer tutoring in the content area of reading (Csapo, 1976;Kreutzer, 1973;Lane, Pollock, & Sher, 1972;McCracken, 1979) and three focused on math, language arts, and social science (Maher, 1982;1986). Spelling was the content area taught in three of the studies (Harrigan, 1994;Hogan & Prater, 1993;Stowitschek, Hecimovic, Stowitschek, & Shores, 1982), and three additional studies examined the effects of peer tutoring on math skills (Gable & Kerr, 1980;Kane & Alley, 1980;Maheady, Sacca, & Harper, 1987). The fi nal three studies focused on improving achievement in social studies classes .…”
Section: Content Of Tutoring For High School Students With Emotional mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research focusing on students with challenging behaviors in the role of cross-age tutor has been limited in recent years but has shown positive outcomes for the tutor, as well as for the tutee (i.e., the student receiving instruction from the tutor; Blake, Wang, Cartledge, & Gardner, 2000; Gumpel & Frank, 1999). Improvements in the areas of reading (Cochran, Feng, Cartledge, & Hamilton, 1993; Top & Osguthorpe, 1987), mathematics (Robinson, Schofield, Steers-Wentzell, 2005), spelling (Stowitschek, Hecimovic, Stowitschek, & Shores, 1982), general test scores, and grades (Maher, 1982, 1984) have been found for tutors with EBD. In addition to academic achievement, research on cross-age tutoring models also suggest positive outcomes in social, emotional, and behavioral skills, including discipline within the classroom setting and the reinforcement of peer relationships (Greenwood, Carta, & Hall, 1988; Maher, 1982, 1984), social skills (Blake et al, 2000; Gumpel & Frank, 1999), on-task behavior (Greenwood, Delquadri, & Hall, 1989; S.…”
Section: Cross-age Tutoring and Students With Ebdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When choosing tutors, N Tutors' social skills may be lower, equal to, or better than their tutees. (Blake et al, 2000;Franca & Kerr, 1990;Stowitschek, Hecimovic, Stowitschek, & Shores, 1982;Weiner, Goldman, Lev, Toledano, & Rosner, 1974).…”
Section: Selecting and Pairing Tutoring Partnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, if a tutor should provide both praise and corrective feedback, therefore the checklist may say, ''I praised (student's name) for one thing he/she did correctly,'' and ''I told (student's name) one thing he/she can do better next time.'' Teachers can also occasionally observe tutoring sessions using the same checklist to ensure that tutoring is being implemented with fidelity (Maher, 1984(Maher, , 1986Stowitschek et al, 1982).…”
Section: Checking the Fidelity Of Tutoring Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%