Behavioral Toxicology 1975
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-2859-9_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Toxicologic Studies of Dieldrin, DDT, and Ruelene in Sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is lipophilic and readily bioaccumulates in animals and humans. Dieldrin exposure during adulthood resulted in deficits in visual discrimination-reversal learning in both sheep (123) and squirrel monkeys (124) and caused rats to make more errors on a zig-zag maze (125). In contrast, one study of perinatal exposure to dieldrin reported facilitated retention of learning on a symmetrical maze (126).…”
Section: Effects Of Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals On Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is lipophilic and readily bioaccumulates in animals and humans. Dieldrin exposure during adulthood resulted in deficits in visual discrimination-reversal learning in both sheep (123) and squirrel monkeys (124) and caused rats to make more errors on a zig-zag maze (125). In contrast, one study of perinatal exposure to dieldrin reported facilitated retention of learning on a symmetrical maze (126).…”
Section: Effects Of Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals On Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first description of its construction (Mowrer & Miller, 1942), the two-way shuttlebox apparatus has been extensively used in the study of both aversive and appetitive (Hollis & Overmier, 1973) conditioning in a wide variety of species: for example, rats (McAllister, McAllister, & Douglass, 1971), dogs (Solomon, Kamin, & Wynne, 1953), sheep (Van Gelder, 1975), fish (Bintz, 1971), cats (Thomas & DeWald, 1977), mice (Anisman, deCatanzaro, & Remington, 1978), monkeys (Pribram & Weiskrantz, 1957), pigs (Dantzer & Mormede, 1976), and humans (Turner & Solomon, 1962). For rats, mice, dogs, cats, pigs, and sheep, the basic design outlined in the first paper (Mowrer & Miller, 1942) has proved useful, excepting, of course, changes in overall dimension to accommodate size differences between these animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%