2012
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2012.16300abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Reactions to Waiting on the Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore suggest future studies implement randomization with the application program. Fourth, for users' tolerance, acceptance, and satisfaction, we adopted single-item measurement (Ryan et al , 2015; Weinberg, 2000). Although it is acceptable within the literature on user experience, this operationalization could be improved by introducing multi-item measurements for tolerance, acceptance and satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We therefore suggest future studies implement randomization with the application program. Fourth, for users' tolerance, acceptance, and satisfaction, we adopted single-item measurement (Ryan et al , 2015; Weinberg, 2000). Although it is acceptable within the literature on user experience, this operationalization could be improved by introducing multi-item measurements for tolerance, acceptance and satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant literature has construed response time to be a salient factor influencing user experience in terms of tolerance, acceptance and satisfaction (See Table 1 for an overview) (Galletta et al , 2004; Kohlisch and Kuhmann, 1997; Ryan et al , 2015; Thum et al , 1995). Specifically, some studies have used tolerance to depict user experience by identifying its negative relationship with response time (El Louadi and Ali, 2010; Nah, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundation and Hypotheses Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we also contribute to the literature examining waiting time in the context of online services (Weinberg, 2000; Dellaert and Kahn, 1999; Ryan et al , 2015). This stream of literature warns against the dangers of having customers wait a long time to have their needs meet as different customers have different levels of tolerance for wait times (Nah, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stream of literature warns against the dangers of having customers wait a long time to have their needs meet as different customers have different levels of tolerance for wait times (Nah, 2004). Customers’ expectations have increased significantly, and online customer waiting has been linked to various negative outcomes, such as lack of trust in the brand, abandonment, negative brand attitudes and interrupted activity (Ryan et al , 2015). We augment this stream of research by proposing perceived social media agility as a possible solution to reducing customer waiting time, and thus, mitigate the negative consequences associated with this phenomenon.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a product/brand-centered process when the loyalty state of mind is constructed around the very characteristics and attributes of the product or service itself, using websites just as a means to reach the products and transfer information to complete the buying process. The second one is related to the website being the intention to repurchase on the same website and to recommend it through different online or mobile channels even if it is not the same product [23][24][25]. In this case, we speak about loyalty toward the website itself.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%